User talk:Chunwook

Welcome!

Hello, Chunwook, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Neo-Jay 00:26, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kim Yu-Na[edit]

Most changes that I make at the Kim Yu-Na page are corrections on grammatical errors. I have added and will add contents if they are relevant to Kim Yu-Na and also helpful for the readers of the page. I included external links to a few fan forums of Kim, but dropped "Kim Yu-Na Gallery" because posts in the forum are exclusively in Korean, and excessive jargons are used in the forum, although we can find some interesting fan artworks there.

Psychotic Illnes Virginia Tech Massacare[edit]

You are right for removing that sentence--Missionimpossible 22:40, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:29, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Kim Yu-Na do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. I suggest you take a look at this. MS (Talk|Contributions) 03:40, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The guidelines provide that links to forums are "normally to be avoided," but "not prohibited." Those forums that I linked seem to be well organized and, I believe, helpful for the readers of the Kim Yu-Na page. I had included a Korean fan forum, but dropped it because the tone of the posts in the forum does not match the reasonable expectation of many readers. We can find other Wikipedia pages containing links to such forums.--Chunwook (talk) 03:59, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why do I get the feeling that you and Top On Ice are the same person? Sorry if I'm mistaken, but that person has taken many identities just to edit the Kim article to their biased liking, so it's easy to be suspicious. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.195.161.37 (talk) 22:01, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's funny, but I'm not that crazy. The person, Top On Ice, doesn't even seem to know how to write a correct English sentence. As I wrote in the discussion, I started editing Kim's page just last week or something. (I'm not a regular editor here so that I'm not familiar with policies of Wiki. However, I believe my questions and actions were right, based on those policies here. I'm in the legal field so that I know how to read and understand language in statutes, but here the understanding and application of (those poorly written) policies are quite arbitrary.) I happened to started correcting grammatical errors because there were so many of them there. I'm extremely busy in real life such that I don't think I can continue to do so.--Chunwook (talk) 22:28, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good to know, and thank you for your current contributions. I'm sure you'll get the hang of Wikipedia's policies with enough practice and be a great editor (if you'll continue to make edits). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.236.67.204 (talk) 05:37, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.--Chunwook (talk) 20:33, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009[edit]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Bubba hotep. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. The Real Libs-speak politely 17:43, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Did you have something to say to me? [1] How brave. Wait for me to retire and then come out with the compliments. – B.hotep •talk• 00:17, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]