User talk:Chupon

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

• To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).
• Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
• If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
• Follow the Wikipedia:Simplified Ruleset
• Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
• Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
• Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!

Meelar (talk) 21:52, August 15, 2005 (UTC)

Question...

Do you have a source for this edit: [1]? Thanks. --LV ^{(Dark Mark)} 16:55, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Rotten Tomatoes, although it's pretty common knowledge. -- Chupon 17:10, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

So please cite your sources in the future. It's no big deal, we just want to make sure things are verifiable. Cheers, my friend. --LV ^{(Dark Mark)} 17:24, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

redirect

It was incorrect to redirect Niguai as you did. There is more than one species in this genus. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:15, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

american conservatism

would you please lodge a formal 'support' vote at the talk page? , thank you. --Isolani 19:32, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Ratdog or RatDog?

Greetings, Chupon. I have undone your edits that were intended to rename Ratdog to RatDog, for two reasons: (1) the technical procedure that would be used for renaming this article would be different than what you did, and (2) I feel pretty strongly that this should be discussed first. So, let's discuss it, at Talk:Ratdog#Ratdog or RatDog?. Thanks. — Mudwater ^(Talk) 00:37, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for joining the discussion on the article's talk page. Renaming an article is usually a big enough change that it should be discussed first. We should give other editors some time to weigh in with their opinions -- possibly as long as a few weeks, depending on how things go. After that, if there's a consensus to rename the article, I'm planning on taking care of that. As for the technical question of how to rename an article, that's explained in detail at Help:Moving a page, so you can read all about it there. One of the things it says is, "You should never just move a page by cutting all the text out of one page, and pasting it into a new one; old revisions, notes, and attributions are much harder to keep track of if you do that." To summarize what the help page says, the usual way to rename an article is to click on the "move" tab at the top of the article and then, on the page you'll see, carefully fill in the new article name and the reason for the move. The main thing to watch out for is that if there are any links to the article that were redirects before the rename, those need to be fixed, as described in the "How to" section of the help page. But, renaming an article by clicking on the "move" tab doesn't work in certain situations, including this one -- the new name is a redirect page that already has an edit history. This can all start to seem a bit complicated, but the basic concept is that an article generally should be renamed by clicking the "move" tab, not by copying and pasting the article. (If you reply here I will see what you say.) — Mudwater ^(Talk) 02:45, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

The Ratdog article has now been renamed to RatDog. Thanks for your participation in the process. — Mudwater ^(Talk) 15:29, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Verifiability

None of the many "music festival" articles you have been creating appear to be referenced with reliable sources. Please refrain from creating articles unless their content can be properly verified. -- Scjessey (talk) 16:53, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

• I'm performing page cleanup by separating already existing data onto other pages. These are notable festivals it's just that the main article for that festival was getting too large because every year was listed on one page. I'm simply separating the years so they are on their own page. -- Chupon (talk) 16:56, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Typo redirect Blago

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Blago, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Blago is a redirect page resulting from an implausible typo (CSD R3).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Blago, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 23:10, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Langerado

Hey Chupon. You're right, those aren't vandalism, sorry for the revert. However, it's very hard to tell that someone removing content is doing so with good intentions when there's no edit summary. I think if you use one in the future you'll be much more likely to avoid the issue. Thanks! FlyingToaster 02:40, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2009 10,000 Lakes Festival

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article 2009 10,000 Lakes Festival, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Future festival, violation of WP:CRYSTAL.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. TN‑X-Man 15:50, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of 2001 Summer Camp Music Festival

I have nominated 2001 Summer Camp Music Festival, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2001 Summer Camp Music Festival. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Mayalld (talk) 16:28, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Note

The rules for formatting the Musician infobox template are very clear. The current member/former member fields are strictly "name only". No other text, like deceased is allowed in the the musician infobox. Life status for band members is detailed in the body of the article text, not the box. Please do add any text that ignores the formatting rules of the template. The Real Libs-speak politely 22:39, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Great editing, keep up the good work! The Real Libs-speak politely 22:48, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of 2011 Coachella Valley Music and Arts Festival for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2011 Coachella Valley Music and Arts Festival is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 Coachella Valley Music and Arts Festival until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Resolute 16:49, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Chupon/Recipes

User:Chupon/Recipes, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Chupon/Recipes and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Chupon/Recipes during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. SL93 (talk) 01:56, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Live Nation template

The bolded venues are those Live Nation owns; the other venues are those leased or operated.

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cleversage logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cleversage logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:24, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Chupon. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Chupon. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Chupon. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Chupon. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cleversafe logo following IBM acquisition.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cleversafe logo following IBM acquisition.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

"High Voltage (australiam album)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect High Voltage (australiam album) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 7 § High Voltage (australiam album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:14, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)