User talk:Clementine2009

Please do not add advertising or inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in ErbB. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:18, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding advertising or inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in MAPK/ERK pathway. It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:20, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you insert advertising or a spam link, as you did to Erythropoietin, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:26, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links[edit]

Please do not add any additional external links to sabiosciences.com. A few selected links might be acceptable but mass addition of links from numerous Wikipedia articles to a commercial site is not acceptable. Thank you. Boghog (talk) 19:15, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for spamming or advertising. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 19:30, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Clementine2009 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am a scientist at SABiosciences. Since all the signaling pathway entries, such as ErbB, MAPK/ERK... are all written in text, our Signaling Pathway Maps can help the readers a great deal by providing a detailed picture of the complicated signaling events. This is not an advertising nor a spam

Decline reason:

It is for this very reason that we have our policy on editing in areas where you have an inherent conflict of interest. It is difficult for most people to see where the line is between "helping" and "spamming" when the subject is one they are personally or professionally involved with.Beeblebrox (talk) 19:36, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.