User talk:Clhen88

A cup of tea for you![edit]

Thanks for starting with ANTH 2501 on Wikipedia! Sub specie aeternitatis (talk) 18:48, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New sources[edit]

Significant contribution to the list of sources on the previous version. My only concern is that there now seems to be a disproportionate amount of sources from local areas. Considering the extensive range of a topic as universal as anthropocentrism, I think the sources should be a little more varied. The content of these sources however, did relate smoothly to the topic as a whole. Eldelorme (talk) 02:57, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Broaden religious influence[edit]

The use of Christianity as force in the adoption of anthropocentrism is effective, however it should be placed as a subcategory under religion in general. This would aid in determining a link between major religions and the subject. Eldelorme (talk) 03:01, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]