User talk:Coldpower27

Welcome!

Hello, Coldpower27, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Karm a fist 05:18, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OEM list[edit]

Hi, I would suggest you add your list of OEM's either to the OEM article, or create a new article-list, but I don't see this content belongs in ATI Technologies, NVIDIA, etc. Thanks. Outriggr 06:06, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of Intel Xeon microprocessors[edit]

Reverting the part numbers wasn't intentional--there was an edit conflict, and they must've got lost in there. I didn't even notice it. Sorry about that. jgp ^T_C 06:02, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: List of AMD Duron microprocessors; Socket 939; Matrox; I686; Texel (graphics); Socket 563; Intel 80287; Socket 478; Intel 80387; SPARC; X86 virtualization; Socket AM2; Gelato (software); Chipset; Slot A; ATX; Transform and lighting; Intel 80387SX; Am286

Cleanup: Socket 479; Intel Inboard 386; The Inquirer
Merge: AMD K6; Graphics pipeline; Kibibyte
Add Sources: Sempron; Celeron; Socket 940
Wikify: Speculative execution; MIMD; Subthreshold leakage
Expand: Am386; Pixel shader; Intel Viiv

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 21:42, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Work in Progress for Radeon R600 Article[edit]

	Radeon X1950 XTX	Radeon HD 2400 XT	Radeon HD 2600 XT	Radeon HD 2900 XT	GeForce 8800 Ultra
Transistor count	384 million	180 million	390 million	700 million	681 (~686) million
Manufacturing process	90 nm	65 nm	65 nm	80 nm	90 nm
Die Area	352 mm²	70 mm²	155 mm²	425 mm²	480 mm²
Core clock speed	650 MHz	700 MHz	800 MHz	742 MHz	612 MHz
Shader clock speed	650 MHz	700 MHz	800 MHz	742 MHz	1500 MHz
Number of Shader Processing units	48 + (8)	40	120	320	128
Number of ROPs	16	4	4	16	24
Number of TMUs	16	4	8	16	32
Peak pixel fill rate (theoretical)	10.4 Gigapixel/s	2.8 Gigapixel/s	3.2 Gigapixel/s	11.9 Gigapixel/s	14.7 Gigapixel/s
Peak texture fill-rate (theoretical)	10.4 Gigatexel/s	2.8 Gigatexel/s	6.4 Gigatexel/s	11.9 Gigatexel/s	39.2 Gigatexel/s
On-board memory interface	256 (8*32-bit)	64 (2*32-bit)	128 (4*32-bit)	512 (8*64-bit)	384 (6*64-bit)
Memory clock speed	1.6 GHz GDDR3	1.6 GHz GDDR3	2.2 GHz GDDR4	1.65 GHz GDDR3	2.16 GHz GDDR3
Peak memory bandwidth	51.2 GB/s	12.8 GB/s	35.2 GB/s	105.6 GB/s	103.7 GB/s

Intel Core 2 CPUs[edit]

I am very impressed by your work on the future/current Intel Core 2 Lists. It makes my work on the Core architecture product lineups very easy.

On a related note, you'll notice the lineup tables on the architecture page have a column indicating the manufacturing process, and they all are listed as 65 nm. That column may have seemed redundant to most viewers, but I expressly put that in there knowing that Intel would release their 45 nm shrinks of the current Merom/Conroe/Woodcrest and their variants. I can finally put a Penryn entry in!

--Masud 01:41, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Where do you get processor information?[edit]

I've noticed that you consistently add information on new processors before I have ever heard of them. In fact, in many cases I hear about future processors on Wikipedia! My question is where do you get all this information? -- Imperator3733 01:33, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just here and there from the web and google mainly. I just post to Wikipedia immediately anything I tend to find that actually makes sense.Coldpower27 03:12, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Celeron400sequence.PNG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Celeron400sequence.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:18, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Erection[edit]

An editor has nominated Erection, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erection and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:59, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of future Intel Core 2 microprocessors[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of future Intel Core 2 microprocessors, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

This list is completely out of date, and as Core i7 has been released to succeed Core 2, there are no more future Core 2 processors

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Orange Mike | Talk 17:45, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]