User talk:Corrector88

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Corrector88, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Re:JAKE E[edit]

I don't need to the deletion link, i'm the one who nominated the page for deletion, and the sad truth of the matter is that right now there really isn't anything in you draft to justify recreating the article. Most of the citations are to primary sources, not secondary sources, and the external links section is essentially a mass collection of social media sites we we greatly frown on here. On your own your barely reaching the threshold of notability, the article's multiple recreations count against you spectacularly here because they lend the perception that you or your fans are desperate to have this page here, which creates several issues for the rest of us on top of the already questionable article recreations. As for my help: I'm willing to lend it, but honestly I think you'd be best just accepting the redirect for the time being, all the more so since you yourself have confessed to working on the article, which puts you at odds with our conflict of interest policies. TomStar81 (Talk) 21:02, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jake E. (Amaranthe) (January 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

A large number of sources, none of which meet the WP:RS criteria

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jake E. (Amaranthe) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jake E. (Amaranthe), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chetsford (talk) 05:19, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Corrector88! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chetsford (talk) 05:19, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]