User talk:Cronides2

Welcome!

Hello, Cronides2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Sleep to Live Institute, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! RT | Talk 19:16, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Sleep to Live Institute[edit]

I have nominated Sleep to Live Institute, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sleep to Live Institute. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. RT | Talk 19:16, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:46, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

talkback[edit]

Hello, Cronides2. You have new messages at Xymmax's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Orphaned non-free image File:STL Institute Green.gif[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:STL Institute Green.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:12, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:STL test station single tower.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:STL test station single tower.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:33, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest?[edit]

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 19:01, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sleep hygiene[edit]

I share your frustration with the content of Sleep hygiene. However, I think we need to follow WP:NOTHOWTO and WP:MEDRS to properly cite and present the information. --Ronz (talk) 19:01, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free files in your user space[edit]

Hey there Cronides2, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Cronides2/sandbox/Sleep to Live Institute. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

See a log of files removed today here.

Shut off the bot here.

Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:00, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:STL Institute White.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:STL Institute White.JPG. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:07, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Diagnostics2.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Diagnostics2.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:08, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest[edit]

Your single-minded focus on the "sleep to live institute", a commercial entity, is strongly indicative of a conflict of interest. Wikipedia is not a venue for advertising or promotion and we discourage people from writing about their employers, businesses or any other subject where they have a vested interest. I've checked this subject out, all your "sources" appear to be "churnalism" - reprints of press releases and uncritical coverage prompted by press releases. There are no independent news hits, no mentions in the professional literature. Guy (Help!) 16:38, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for the feedback. Xymmax had specifically moved the article to my sandbox so that I could improve the source articles and notability issues. I have only recently come back to work on it and had recently added hits from notable sources as USA Today and Times News. Additionally, a Mattress Matters article was recently published by Research Triangle International. I understand being involved in the company puts me in a position of a potential conflict of interest; however, I believe I have presented the material in an unbiased manner and have been commended by editors previously on my efforts to do so. The organization is a sleep research and education entity and does not itself produce any products to advertise or promote. Surely, being an authority on the functions and history of the organization is not a reason to bar creation of an article? Cronides2 (talk) 17:30, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

These sources are all basically just responses to press releases. As I say, it's not an academic institution or even an industry body, it's a one-company promotional entity. It's not notable, and your judgment of its notability is clearly coloured by your own involvement. Guy (Help!) 20:28, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just saw this. I commented in greater detail on my page, but essentially I question whether this article was ready for mainspace. I proably would have restored it, and immediately listed it at AfD. You can list this at deletion review if you want to question the process here, but like JzG I think the content is still problematic. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 14:28, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]