User talk:Culverdene

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Culverdene, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Naturenet | Talk 07:44, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

isleofwight.co.uk[edit]

Hello Culverdene. Please do not keep re-adding the external link www.isleofwight.co.uk to the Isle of Wight article. Wikipedia is not a linkfarm and the article does not need another external link to a site promoting tourism on the island. It probably doesn't even need the 'official' one it already has. In addition, please note that once an addition has been reverted, it should not be reinserted as part of an edit war - please read WP:BRD and WP:3RR. Thanks. PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 00:25, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you have turned off your email option so have tried to leave you a message via talk. Hope you get it ok. I have no idea what an edit war is but would like you to stop deleting this link. ThanksCulverdene (talk) 11:36, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have opened a discussion about this issue at Talk:Isle of Wight#External links. Please enter into the discussion there. Thanks. PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 07:59, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sandown Sprint (April 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tvx1 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sandown Sprint and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sandown Sprint, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

T v x1 19:29, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviwing this so quickly. I'm afraid my lack of Wikipedia experince is showing. This event did get a good amount of coverage before and after, from what I feel are independent sources. I have tried to add some further citations (is this the corect way to demonstrate the sources?) although two of the ones I've added look like they are flagged for missing detail. I will try and find a tutorial to work out how these can be modified. If you have any duggestions I'd be grateful.

Cheers. Culverdene (talk) 10:51, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have added more external references and corected the ones that I had not done properly. I'm learning as I go. Will try to resubmit now. Cheers. Culverdene (talk) 13:07, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Culverdene! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! T v x1 19:29, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to try this first. Cheers! Culverdene (talk) 10:52, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sandown Sprint (August 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Scope creep were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Article is full of unreliable references, social media links. No indication of notable, no definition of notability. Refs are mix of WP:PRIMARY, interviews and post-event reports. No real secondary coverage available to show its notable. Why is it notable?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sandown Sprint and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

scope_creep^Talk 13:42, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sandown Sprint[edit]

Hello, Culverdene. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sandown Sprint, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]