User talk:DanielVGarcia

DanielVGarcia, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi DanielVGarcia! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Osarius (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Park City Mining District (June 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Park City, Utah. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This appears to be mostly additions to the historical section of the existing article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Park City Mining District and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 00:14, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Park City Mining District (June 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MorbidEntree was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Park City Mining District and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MorbidEntree - _{(Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥)}^(Contribs)(please reply using {{ping}},^{(unless this is on my own talk page)} otherwise I may not see your reply) 08:49, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Resubmission of Park City Mining District[edit]

You removed the AFC decline notice from Draft: Park City Mining District and resubmitted it without other changes, without waiting for a reply from the editors at the Teahouse. AFC declines and comments contain a note that says that they should not be removed. They are left in place until the article is accepted, and are then removed by the acceptance script. Maybe you didn't know not to remove them. Now you do know. Do not remove them. Also, do not resubmit drafts after they have been declined without making the requested changes or discussing with the reviewer or other editors. Merely resubmitting a draft is tendentious and gives the impression that you are gambling to see if you get an easier reviewer on the next attempt. Consider this to be a level 2 caution not to resubmit drafts without either addressing the comments or at least discussing. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:52, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to add anything to my talk page, add it at the bottom in the usual way, not at the top. The Teahouse is peculiar in top-posting. However, it is a reasonable place to discuss your article, rather than just pushing it. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:52, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@RobertMcClenon. I am sorry for any confusion. This is my first go with Wikipedia, and was not completely sure about the procedures. I also did make some minor changes between the first and second submissions but was unaware of the rules with the AFC decline notice. I saw the other editors comments on the teahouse however and was wondering about your thoughts. Please let me know. DanielVGarcia (talk) 03:06, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Park City Mining District has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Park City Mining District. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:54, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Park City Mining District (July 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tseung Kwan O was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

More references are need to establish notability of the subject involved and verify the claims made in the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Park City Mining District and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tseung Kwan O Let's talk 20:45, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Park City Mining District (August 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from http://utahrails.net/mining/silver-king-coalition.php. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly exists under a compatible licence and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Park City Mining District may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—MRD2014 (talk) (contribs) 14:09, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]