User talk:Danski454/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 8

A barnstar for you!

The Technical Barnstar
I've always been annoyed at the code editing window size - thank you for creating this script --DannyS712 (talk) 22:12, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Thank you! Danski454 (talk) 08:18, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Help if you have some time

Hi, again. Thank you for your help on Template:Featured picture. I was wondering if you have the time to help me again. I am trying to get Wikipedia:Main Page history#2019 to display two archives of the Main Page per day when there are two DYKs in a 24 hour period. This requires editing how Template:Main Page history is written. I am playing around with Template:2019 Main Page history and Template:2019 Main Page history/sandbox ← both of which I created from Template:Daily archive log. Can you think of how to create a template to work for this idea? I am thinking that the bot would create the pages like one of these two options:

  1. Wikipedia:Main Page history/2019 August 30/1 and Wikipedia:Main Page history/2019 August 30/2
  2. Wikipedia:Main Page history/2019 August 31a and Wikipedia:Main Page history/2019 August 30b

I am just trying to think it out before formally proposing it. Basically, what we need is a calendar that can display two links on days that are double DYK days. It can be complicated and self-reliant OR simple that can be edited manually. Any ideas or suggestions would be appreciated. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 12:54, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

@Coffeeandcrumbs: I've edited the sandbox to include everything between the date and the next space in the link, so it picks up August 31a rather than just August 31a. This is the simple that can be edited manually option, creating a self-reliant version would likely be complicated and inefficient. If this is good I can make a generic version (so new years can be created). --Danski454 (talk) 20:42, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Looking good. Please proceed with creating the generic version. I am think at Template:Main Page history generic calendar or something like that. If you can think of a better location feel free to change. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 22:11, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Boyd Wagner--I Don't Know How the Page Was Edited

"Hello, I'm Danski454. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Boyd Wagner have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. 20:57, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

   If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Boyd Wagner. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Danski454 (talk) 20:59, 23 June 2018 (UTC)."

I have no idea what this pertains to. I have never made an edit to a Wikipedia page in my life, and I don't share either my computer or IP address with anyone. In fact, I didn't even have Internet service in 2018, so I don't know how I could've done it. I may have visited the Boyd Wagner page at some point in time since it appears that he was born in my area, but I don't even remember doing that.

138.207.245.221 (talk) 05:54, 18 September 2019 (UTC)Michele with no username

The edits in question were probably made by another person who had been assigned your IP address in June 2018. IP addresses automatically are reassigned to different users on a regular basis. You can ignore old warnings, and remove them if you want. Danski454 (talk) 19:12, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 9

All Time Top 1000 Albums

Dear Dan Your recent change was not correct. There were no public polls for any of the Editions of the book. I have listed the exact source of the vast majority of the votes, over several years. The cover of the 3rd Edition clearly stares " Over 200,000 votes from the fans, the experts and the critics. Please see my alternative changes or revert to the original that you changed recently. regards Muso805 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Muso805 (talkcontribs) 08:30, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

@Muso805: I think you may have gotten the wrong user, I have never edited that page. Also, in future it would be helpful to link to the article in question. Danski454 (talk) 16:36, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Apologies -- you are correct I took an older change/deletion from you in error. Thank you for pointing out. Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Colin Larkin (talkcontribs) 08:46, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 10

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

editToken

Hello Danski454,

Your scripts User:Danski454/move-links.js and User:Danski454/RMcloser.js are no longer functional because they attempt to get an editToken from mw.user.tokens. The scripts should instead get a csrfToken. editTokens were removed from mw.user.tokens on October 3, 2019 at Phabricator during this edit as they were redundant to csrfTokens.BrandonXLF (talk) 00:06, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 11

Episode V (disambiguation)

Hi Danski. It sounds like I need to explain this a bit. I want to delete Episode V (disambiguation) because its target is also a disambiguation page. Thankfully, nothing links to it because it's a redirect that was recently created by accident. However, nominating it for deletion immediately would not be proper because it has edit history that goes back to 2005. I would like the histories of Episode V (disambiguation) and Episode Five to be switched before we proceed with deletion. Does this make sense? Connor Behan (talk) 15:59, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

@Connor Behan: Redirects ending in (disambiguation) are supposed to exist, so we know links to dabs are intentional, this is explained by the template on Episode V (disambiguation). (Also, even though the page is 15 years old, its history does not need preservation) Danski454 (talk) 16:04, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Our edits to WP:Rollback

Hi Danski- Sorry if I got that edit wrong. What you wrote in your edit summary seems to contradict with the first sentence of the Rollback article and with the "How it works section", hence my decision to revert despite my lack of expertise.

Do you know this rollback and the Twinkle one well? I use the latter fairly frequently, and have always been confused by the existence of another tool with the same name that requires elevated privileges. Do you know why the have the same name, and if anyone has ever proposed renaming one of them in order to reduce confusion? Eric talk 16:29, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

It's OK. Regarding your question, Rollback and Twinkle do essentially the same thing, hence have the same name. I'm not aware of any proposals to rename either. Danski454 (talk) 17:09, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 12

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 13

"Warning shot (diambiguation)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the redirect Warning shot (diambiguation) should be deleted, kept, or retargeted. It will be discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 23#Warning shot (diambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 20:08, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Stubsearch function

Hi Danski454! Until recently I used the "Stub search" function under the "More" menu quite a lot, but in the last month or so I've been unable to find the stub cats I want with it. For example, I'm sorting Nepal geography stubs, but none of the provinces or zones show up when I type them into the search field (Province No. 5, Bagmati, Bheri, etc.). It doesn't seem to matter whether the stub cat is new or old. Maybe it's just a Nepal issue? Am I missing something, or has the code changed? Cheers, Her Pegship (I'm listening) 18:34, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 14

Chosun Ilbo

Quit correcting my edits without permission and quit defending the extreme left by lying about the Chosun Ilbo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.59.32.131 (talk) 00:38, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 15

Thanks for fixing my Dad’s page.

I was trying to update it for Father’s Day after his passing a couple months ago and I honestly have no idea what I’m doing. I appreciate you fixing it. JenJenAK (talk) 23:28, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 16

Re: July 2020

Criticism of Hinduism should not be redirecting to Anti-Hindu sentiment (as it was), so I removed the redirect. I see you've now edited it to the redirect to the correct page. I'll keep in mind to add a description for edits. Thanks for the tips. Mimosapigra (talk) 01:06, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

R2. Cross-namespace redirects

In this edit [1] your edit summary was "You can't redirect a page to draft space and then claim r2". What makes you think that? One of the recommended tool for new page curation, User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js, does exactly that. --John B123 (talk) 22:29, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

@John B123: Moving a page to draftspace and applying R2 to the redirect is fine. What you did was replace the original article with a redirect and tag it for speedy deletion. When moving a page to draft space, its content remains online, just as a draft. But if the article was converted to a redirect to a draft and then deleted, the history would be deleted. Danski454 (talk) 22:39, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
The article had been copied and pasted, not moved, from draft (hence the history merge request on the page) and so existed in both mainspace and draft. I had to manually place the redirect on the mainspace article as I couldn't move it because it already existed in draft. I also placed the R2 tag at that time. To be clear, the draft article existed when I place the redirect and tagged R2. If somebody subsequently makes the draft a redirect and then deletes it, that is beyond my control but doesn't make my actions incorrect. --John B123 (talk) 22:54, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 17

RM closure script

Hello, I saw you were working on a super cool script that would help over at RM. Please continue making it since I have been debating that a script like XFD closure be made for RM’s. I try to reduce the backlog there and it would really be helpful. Best regards Megan☺️ Talk to the monster 12:22, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 18

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 19

Invitation to WikiProject Current Events

Hello. I wanted to invite you to the WikiProject of Current Events. Most editors are not aware that the WikiProject became active again earlier this year. Hope you join! Elijahandskip (talk) 15:24, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 20