User talk:DirectKnowledge

Deletion discussion about Michael Alden, Esq

Hello, DirectKnowledge,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Michael Alden, Esq should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Alden, Esq .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Wittylama 13:41, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

DirectKnowledge, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi DirectKnowledge! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Dathus (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:25, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

your comments at Talk:Michael Alden, Esq ‎

As this article is now listed for deletion you need to make any comments about it's retention at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Alden, Esq. No account will be taken of comments posted anywhere else. Nthep (talk) 18:13, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

October 2014

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Secret ^account 19:43, 18 October 2014 (UTC)