User talk:Dontbescaredhomie11

May 2013[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Carlos Condit ‎, you may be blocked from editing. BearMan998 (talk) 18:13, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dontbescaredhomie11, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Hi Dontbescaredhomie11! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Hajatvrc (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm TreyGeek. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Nate Diaz because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!
Your attempts at putting Diaz's "Twitter Controversy" has been reverted by multiple people. At this point, please discuss the issue on the talk page. TreyGeek (talk) 22:24, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nate Diaz. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.
See my message above. TreyGeek (talk) 22:36, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Nate Diaz shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. TreyGeek (talk) 22:53, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:46, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Bryan Caraway, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bbb23 (talk) 19:42, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 19:44, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]