User talk:Doortmont/Archive 1

Image source problem with Image:Lucas bolsius.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Lucas bolsius.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:55, 24 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. COBot 22:55, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:M VA0958.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:M VA0958.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:08, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Johannes François Snelleman[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Johannes François Snelleman, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Johannes François Snelleman seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Johannes François Snelleman, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 14:00, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008[edit]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Hendrik Pieter Nicolaas Muller has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Will ^(talk) 20:25, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Was not testing, but should have locked the edit as in use; will also make better use of My Private Sandbox. Michel Doortmont (talk) 21:42, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:WFReitz CHM VA0957.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:WFReitz CHM VA0957.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:17, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:KwesiNduom.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on Image:KwesiNduom.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:KwesiNduom.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Polly (Parrot) 19:40, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your statement on the talk page confused releasing an image to the public, and releasing an image into the public domain, which are different concepts. PhilKnight (talk) 22:41, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:CJ Vels VA0901.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:CJ Vels VA0901.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:50, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Boer_Legation_VA0949.jpg[edit]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Boer_Legation_VA0949.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MECU≈talk 13:06, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For some reason source description did not copy. I restored this. Image is solidly in the '70 years or less' public domain of the three PD-tags used (they complement each other!). The image was produced in 1900 in the Netherlands. Note on reusage was misconstrued or phrased inaccurately: keeper of the image (Provincial Archives of the Free State, South Africa) just appreciates full recognition of custodianship in re-usage and notification through address given. Hope this suffices; please remove tag. Michel Doortmont (talk) 20:26, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for clearing it up. I have one more question: What do you mean "source description did not copy"? Where did you copy from? MECU≈talk 12:39, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - It did not copy from the standard template that I (re)used, I think. Michel Doortmont (talk) 15:18, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikisource email notifications[edit]

Hi, after a proposal to enable email notification, Wikisource is now able to notify you of any changes to pages on your watchlist and/or changes to your talk page. In order to take advantage of these features, you need to enabled them in your preferences. --John Vandenberg ^(chat) 14:49, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Second Boer War[edit]

I have made some edits to the lead and earlier sections of the article. I noticed your additions to the article and on the talk page so thought I would inform you that I am engaging in a massive rewrite of the article. Any comments or edits to improve are welcome. Thanks LordHarris 09:31, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Romance-speaking states of Europe[edit]

Template:Romance-speaking states of Europe has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you.--DerRichter (talk) 02:49, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Colons and Boers Republics[edit]

Weklkom, sorry for my "vandalism" in your sandbox. In polish wikipedia we make something like that because in categories show links to sandboxes. Next time i dont do that. Could you give me more info about my map (South Africa in end of XIX century-1885)? I see you are interesting in South African history, together we can make a good profesional map. I trying to show all bigger boers republics but i basic on this map:w:fr:Image:Boerenrepublieken.png. I know- Vrijheid was part of Natalia Republic in this time. So i make him in nearly color. Please help me with that- maybe i made few-2 or more map of boers republics if on 1 map i cant show all republics?_{Killroyus| talk} 08:27, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea, will get back to you. Michel Doortmont (talk) 08:59, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:William Dunn 01.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:William Dunn 01.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Sdrtirs (talk) 21:29, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of William Dunn, 1st Baronet, of Lakenheath[edit]

A tag has been placed on William Dunn, 1st Baronet, of Lakenheath requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Closedmouth (talk) 14:23, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]