User talk:Dt128/Archive 2

Beat Again[edit]

The only reason the article appears to have any size is because all information has been repeated three times in different formats. It's 3:17 long: that shows up in "release and background", the infobox, and the tracklisting. It's available as a physical single and a download: again, in "release and background", the infobox, and the tracklisting. B-Side is a Rihanna cover: again, "release and background", infobox, tracklisting. The music video shows them "dancing in front of colored lights" is not earth-shattering information. A picture of them dancing in front of colored lights, as if the reader couldn't grasp the concept without a picture (you really need to read WP:NFCC, specifically criterion 8). Release date appears twice, label appears three times. It's a heavily padded stub. Reduce it to the actual information, and it gets three sentences in JLS (band), which is where the redirect points.—Kww(talk) 15:42, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if I sounded patronizing. Certainly didn't intend it. I'm sick today, so maybe the fact that I feel pretty crummy shows in my writing.—Kww(talk) 15:52, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NSONGS calls for the song to have charted, or to have been covered by multiple groups on multiple recordings. Beat Again has done neither of those things.—Kww(talk) 13:50, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I give up. After redirecting, a worse version of the article was created, so I restored yours (minus the "TBA" stuff). Be warned: if it doesn't chart by July 20, I'll put it up for AFD. The only hope for survival at that point will be if this article is extremely well written, with numerous third-party sources and not a lot of repetitive material.—Kww(talk) 16:33, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:DELUXE EP.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:DELUXE EP.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Σxplicit 17:16, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Rockferry[edit]

Template:Rockferry has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 17:48, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Dt¹²⁸_SpeakToMe 19:42, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Lostprophets discography/archive4[edit]

Hi, thanks for your thorough review at this FLC. Please revisit when you can. Cheers, Dabomb87 (talk) 15:55, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could you do me a favour?[edit]

hey, thanks for your help with the lostprophets discography! it was promoted today :) could you do me a favour and have a look at The Saturdays discography and give me some suggestions for improvement? thanks! Mister sparky (talk) 17:07, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use of File:Love Story UK.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Love Story UK.jpg. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the {{di-fails NFCC}} tag itself.

An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 17:47, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Alexandra Burke[edit]

Template:Alexandra Burke has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 23:59, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Miley Cyrus discography, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Chase wc ⁹¹ 17:15, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]