User talk:Dustybooks89

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image tagging for Image:BISHOP GOSS.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:BISHOP GOSS.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:05, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:SeafieldHousesm.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:SeafieldHousesm.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:13, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Seafield Convent Grammar, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 02:45, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Seafield Convent Grammar[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Seafield Convent Grammar, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www-users.york.ac.uk/~scm505/history.html, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:Seafield Convent Grammar/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:Seafield Convent Grammar saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 03:22, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know if you're watching...[edit]

Hello, Dustybooks89. You have new messages at Lifebaka's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Copyright problems with York Entrepreneurs Society[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, York Entrepreneurs Society, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.yorkentrepreneurs.org/site/. As a copyright violation, York Entrepreneurs Society appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. York Entrepreneurs Society has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. JNW (talk) 01:31, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Logo YES Society.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Logo YES Society.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:31, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/St Andrew's Hospital (Dollis Hill), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:46, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC St Andrew's Hospital (Dollis Hill) was accepted[edit]

St Andrew's Hospital (Dollis Hill), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 05:49, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]