Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Troutfarm27 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of books). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Hello, Eacorlor!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Troutfarm27(Talk) 19:17, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AHAFOMAN SENIOR HIGH/TECH SCHOOL and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Ok so to be clear, information from online news articles, independent groups gathering information about schools in Ghana and an official Ghanaian government page are considered as unreliable, not secondary or strictly independent of the schools?
I do understand that some of them were not in-depth because of reasons known to the sources but I don't agree with the rest. That it mean that the school has to be popular with many in-depth articles about them before they c Eacorlor (talk) 12:05, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry this has to be published twice. I made a mistake by clicking on reply before I was done.
Ok so to be clear, information from online news articles, independent groups gathering information about schools in Ghana and an official Ghanaian government page are considered as unreliable, not secondary or strictly independent of the schools?
I do understand that some of them were not in-depth because of reasons known to the sources but I don't agree with the rest. Does it mean that the school has to be popular with many in-depth articles about them before they can be used?
I respect your decision. My aim was to pave the way for knowledge of these subjects to be elaborated.
