User talk:Edouardlicn

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Edouardlicn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- 李博杰  | Talk contribs email 10:09, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Republic of China article[edit]

Since you have previously shared your view regarding a naming convention about the Republic of China, I guess you are interested to share your view at Talk:Republic of China#Requested Move (February 2012). Thanks for your attention. 61.18.170.188 (talk) 10:40, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fazhengnian for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fazhengnian is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fazhengnian until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TheSoundAndTheFury (talk) 15:31, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fazhengnian[edit]

Hello Edouardlicn,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Fazhengnian for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was previously deleted by a consensus decision.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, —Zujine|talk 13:58, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Personal comments are not appropriate[edit]

Please be careful about what you say to people. Some remarks can easily be misinterpreted. Wikipedia is a supportive environment, where contributors should feel comfortable and safe while editing. Thank you.

Your recent comments about User:Hanteng are highly inappropriate. It is nonconstructive and unnecessary to make personal attacks against other editors. You should also be advised that pages related to falungong are subject to discretionary sanctions, and using the site as a platform for ideological struggle and/or the harassment of opponents is considered extremely disruptive. —Zujine|talk 16:34, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

speedy deletion on Fazhengnian[edit]

Repost of Fazhengnian[edit]

A tag has been placed on Fazhengnian requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. Hanteng (talk) 17:35, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AfD for Fazhengnian[edit]

Nomination of Fazhengnian for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fazhengnian is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fazhengnian (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TheSoundAndTheFury (talk) 03:46, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fazhengnian for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fazhengnian is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fazhengnian (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Heyallkatehere (talk) 03:36, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]