User talk:EdvardH
December 2013[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to List of paintings by Edvard Munch has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of paintings by Edvard Munch was changed by EdvardH (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960532 on 2013-12-13T19:15:32+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:15, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of paintings by Edvard Munch may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- |230||||''Young Woman in Blue''||1891||The Art Museums in Bergen. Bergen Art Museum (Rasums Meyer's collection
- |257||||''[[Kiss by the Window (Munch)|Kiss by the Window]''||1891||[[Munch Museum]], Oslo, Norway
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:32, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
EdvardH, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure![edit]
|
Hi EdvardH!! You're invited to play The Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive game to become a great contributor to Wikipedia. It's a fun interstellar journey--learn how to edit Wikipedia in about an hour. We hope to see you there! |
January 2014[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of paintings by Edvard Munch may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- |324||||''[[The Storm (Munch|The Storm]]||1893||[[Museum of Modern Art]], New York, USA
- |643||||''Caricature Portrait of [[Henrik Lund (painter]|Henrik Lund]]''||1905||[[Munch Museum]], Oslo, Norway
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:57, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Gråtende kvinne / Weeping woman[edit]
Hei, kan du sjekke om bildet av maleri nr. 775 egentlig forestiller nr. 777 (det stemmer bedre med beskrivelsen på Commons)? - 4ing (talk) 10:01, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Har sjekket det nå, og er 100% sikker på at bildet forestiller nr. 775. Det som ikke stemte overens med beskrivelsen hos Commons var vel at dateringen på Commons var 1907-09, mens jeg hadde datert det til 1907. Det var en feil fra min side, og jeg ser nå at den riktige dateringen er 1907-09. Dette har jeg nå rettet. Men det er mange dateringer og navn som ikke er felles mellom lista og Commons. Når jeg ser et et bilde på Commons, slår jeg opp på det i katalogen (Edvard Munch - Samlede malerier, Gerd Woll), deretter sammenlikner jeg nøye bildet på Commons med bildet i boka. Til slutt konstanterer jeg hvilket maleri denne Commons-filen forestiller. Jeg har erfart at ikke alle opplysninger gitt ved bilder på Commons er helt til å stole på.
- Forøvrig lover jeg å komme igang med å sette inn norske titler på den norske lista. Jeg har vært litt opptatt den siste tiden (dagene), og jeg har derfor ikke fått muligheten til å utvide den engelske lista så mye. Og planen var jo å bli ferdig med den engelske lista før jeg kommer igang med den norske. EdvardH (talk) 15:37, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Takk for sjekken. Hovedgrunnen til at jeg var tvilende var at disse bildene er tatt under en utstilling i Paris, og så langt har jeg bare kommet over bilder utlånt fra Munchmuseet på denne utstillingen. 775 tilhører imidlertid Bergen Kunstmuseum. Ellers er jeg selvsagt klar over at mye av informasjonen på Commons er hentet fra upålitelige kilder. - mvh 4ing (talk) 17:41, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Hei. Først vil jeg takke deg for alle bilder du har lastet opp på Commons! Du har gjort en strålende jobb, og jeg ser at du overhodet ikke faller innenfor slike Commons-sider med tvilsomme opplysninger som nevnt ovenfor. Bra!
- Jeg er ferdig med den engelske listen og tenkte at jeg nå skulle begynne å sette inn titler i den norske. Etter å ha lest litt om tegnsetting på norsk Wikipedia har jeg forstått at det riktige er å sette anførselstegn rundt navn på kunstverk. Dette ser jeg du også har gjort. Personlig synes jeg det ser bedre ut med kursiv, og det er også brukt på engelsk Wikipedia og (etter å ha lest litt på korrekturavdelingen.no, også mye i) (norske) bøker. Imidlertid bruker aviser anførselstegn, og ettersom Wikipedia jo består av artikler virker det kanskje naturlig å da sette anførselstegn rundt titler på malerier.
- Men denne norske Wikipedia-artikkelen er jo ikke en artikkel i den forstand. Det er en liste. Og med så mange navn etter hverandre kan det etter min mening bli litt stygt med anførselstegn. Og her kommer dermed mitt endelige poeng: kan det da være mulig å gjøre et unntak, og bruke kursiv i steden for anførselstegn? Vil du tillate det, eller er mitt forslag tåpelig og ikke minst i strid med norsk Wikipedias regler? Hilsen EdvardH (talk) 22:01, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you![edit]
|
The Special Barnstar |
| Hi EdvardH, thank You for Your diligent work on List of paintings by Edvard Munch. This ist the kind of content, that gives a real plus to Wikipedia, for the ordinary reader as well as for experts. It helped me already much in determining the paintings for some articles in the German Wikipedia. I hope to transfer the list there soon. The painted Barnstar seems most appropriate to me for this work. Kind regards Magiers (talk) 21:24, 24 January 2015 (UTC) |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, EdvardH. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, EdvardH. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, EdvardH. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)