User talk:El cid the hero

Welcome!

Hello, El cid the hero, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Manual of Style
Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! --Eliezer | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 12:02, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

EXCUSE ME SON[edit]

is "spear time" supposed to be funny? bet youre ace at parties

List of computer and video games considered the worst ever[edit]

Hello El cid the hero,

I am writing you because you are one of the Wikipedians who have editted the List of computer and video games considered the worst ever. However, the way it is being done now, I believe doesn't work. I would like to invite you to take 2 minutes of your time and leave your thoughts on the talk page.

best regards,

JackSparrow Ninja

I read your message on your page and didn't realize that 25% was the cutoff. I'm sure it was there, I probably just skipped it. I always thought that the 39% or below was the markoff (which I had used this entire time) but I guess not. Thanks for the heads up. I'll be sure to use the 25%, not the 39%. guitarhero777777 16:10, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Cleric.JPG)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Cleric.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 20:48, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Centralized video game navbox discussion[edit]

You previously expressed a strongly-stated opinion about a video game navbox or all video game navboxes in general, or perhaps I clicked on your talk page by mistake. Whichever it is, you are invited to offer your opinion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games#Navboxes III: Son of Navboxes. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 07:30, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{Sonic games}} inclusion criteria[edit]

An inclusion criteria for {{Sonic games}} has been proposed at Template talk:Sonic games#Proposed inclusion criteria, with an introductory preamble at Template talk:Sonic games#Shadow III: Son of Shadow. You are cordially invited to discuss the proposal. —davidh.oz.au 23:59, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Video games notable for negative reception[edit]

I'm trying to generate consensus on which games should be included in the article. Feel free to drop by Talk:Video games notable for negative reception and leave your thoughts on the proposed criteria. Cheers, Lankybugger ○ Yell ○ 01:03, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bahamut.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Bahamut.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 08:41, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bahamut.JPG listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bahamut.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. R. Wolff (talk) 11:10, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The iblis trigger listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The iblis trigger. Since you had some involvement with the The iblis trigger redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 23:58, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Iblis Trigger listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Iblis Trigger. Since you had some involvement with the The Iblis Trigger redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 23:59, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bad games listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bad games. Since you had some involvement with the Bad games redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:12, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Giant enemy crab" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Giant enemy crab. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 2#Giant enemy crab until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 21:17, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User category proposed deletion[edit]

You may be interested in Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 August 21#Category:Wikipedians who know where their towel is. It is proposed to delete this category. SpinningSpark 16:23, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]