User talk:Ellhn2012

Macedonian language[edit]

In a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user editing Balkans-related articles in a disruptive way. If you engage in further inappropriate behaviour in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article/topic ban. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:07, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reported for disruptive editing[edit]

You have been reported for your disruptive actions at the Arbitration committee's sanction enforcement page. Expect a ban or block soon. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:37, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Sandstein 15:46, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ellhn2012 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Block future perfect instead. I submitted the article "macedonian language" for deletion, and he immediately found some fake reasons to defend his propaganda article by blocking me,without answering to anybody.This is common practice for him. He acts like a lawyer of FYROM in wikipedia. I have written some texts here,like this and all these admins do is attacking me. Not a single point has been answered.Ellhn2012 (talk) 11:16, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The {unblock} template is for use in appealing a block. It is not for requesting the block of someone else. Please, if you decide to use that template again, use it only to make a clear request for your own unblock- one that specifically addresses what was problematic about your edits, and what you would do differently if unblocked. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 11:21, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please consider the possibility that Wikipedia is just an encyclopedia, and not a good place to fight nationalist battles. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 11:23, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ellhn2012 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Look,i can't find the page of my block discussion,but what do you want me to answer to? This is just ridiculous! You can find it on your own,he accuses me of personal atacks because i defied their clarity as editors!They answered to my deletion submission that i'm wrong because this has already been decided!What else do you need? This admin is in in the propaganda business! Just check out his "work" and you will find out. Has probably blocked all the editors that come here and oppose him.Seems to work well Ellhn2012 (talk) 09:03, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Unblocks are about your behaviour, not for attacking others. As you have now done this twice, I will be revoking your talkpage access - you clearly have no desire to work within this community, nor follow its norms of behaviour (✉→BWilkins←✎) 11:27, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.