User talk:Erlendaakre

Wikitreff i Trondheim[edit]

Hallo! Ser på brukersida di at du bor I Trondheim du også. 28. januar skal det være wikitreff på Mormors i Midtbyen, hadde vært kjkt om du ville komme. Du kan lese mer om det her. Det er også et Facebook-arrangement som man kan melde seg på om man vil. Håper vi ses, Jon Harald Søby (talk) 19:19, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hehe, skulle vært mulig å få mail når denne siden forandres, er vel ett år for sent ute :/ ----Erlend Aakre (talk) 15:39, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

R's journal in the Watchmen[edit]

Hey Aakre. I don't suppose you want to come back and voice an opinion on including Rorschach's journal in the Watchmen? [1] I thought I had a good edit [2] but I getting tired of it. Heck, I'd even appreciate it if you let me know if you think I am being a poor wiki-editor for pushing this. --Bertrc (talk) 04:45, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, if you are interested, I raised an RFC on this [3] (ugh, I hadn't realized that doing so would start yet another journal thread) --Bertrc (talk) 21:13, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Java and Portal[edit]

I recently posted the following text on Wikipedia regarding the creation of a new computing-related project:

'WikiProject Java is a Wikipedian community that aims to better organize information in articles related to the Java programming language and its platform.

If I'm cor-rec-to, there are about 900 articles on Java technology in Wikipedia, which may be more than ALL other programming languages articles combined...

At least, it's more than for C++, and there IS a C++ WikiProject...

And it's MUCH more than the .NET WikiProject with 82 articles...

There is also a Ruby project and a Python portal so...

Now you can also see a proposal for the Java Portal (temp location).'

Please support this initiative, A l a i n R 3 4 5
^{Techno-Wiki-Geek} 20:02, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TAM9[edit]

Erlen I'm sure I met you at TAM9. I'm the beard photographer from the IIG. I also gave a talk on Sunday about editing Wikipedia for skeptical content. I just saw you added a nice picture to the SGU's page. I'm wondering if you have more nice images from skeptical events that might be added to more skeptical pages? I'm in the process of looking thought all 5,000 of the JREF's pictures tonight. I could really use someone who already knows how to upload pictures and edit WP. By the way did you see James Randi's WP page? You might see some familiar people in one of the images. Sgerbic (talk) 06:01, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Some people I don't have really good images of, and better ones are already on the page. But I'll add photos for the pages for Pamela Gay, Lawrence Kraus and Joe Nickell tomorrow. --Erlend Aakre (talk) 23:28, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Starfury Conventions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Baker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Starfury Conventions[edit]

The article Starfury Conventions has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable company with no sources establishing notability of the company or of its events. GNG is not met.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:42, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]