User talk:EtherealDreamscape

August 2017

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Pempek, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 05:30, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Pempek. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 05:35, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

September 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:24, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:27, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

EtherealDreamscape (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was immature (14 years old at that time) and inexperienced in using Wikipedia. I did not realize that my actions actually violated the rules of Wikipedia as I thought that I can do anything I like such as doing pranks on multiple pages and uploading copyrighted files. I am really sorry and promised not to do them again. The main reason why I want to be unblocked is to change my name due to privacy reasons. Amirul Azimin (talk) 02:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Assuming good faith and unblocking. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 20:34, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

• You should come clean about your new account also. CU note: no sign of any undesirable behavior on the new account. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 03:30, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Appeal block

Hello @Jpgordon. It seems that I wrote the unblock appeal template on the wrong section and cannot reply to it. Yes, I promise to be clean 100% and behave well. I will contribute positively from time to time. Amirul Azimin (talk) 03:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

No, you need to tell other reviewing admins about account you've been using (well) since last year. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 04:03, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

I'm not sure what account and the process of telling other reviewing admins are, but I do created a new account called User:JellyLotus. It is still new (6 months of age) and contributed mainly on fixing or updating content. Amirul Azimin (talk) 04:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Just noting that it's easier to reply to talk page comments located on the bottom by opening the edit window directly(click "edit" at the top of the page or in the section header"); the Reply feature is imperfect and doesn't work well in some situations. 331dot (talk) 09:05, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Yeah I noticed that it had several problems. There was something odd when I tried to reply to my block appeal with a short message saying that I cannot reply and requires using the "full page edit". I believe that it might be caused by code limitations or errors of the unblock appeal template which made it on a different section instead of a newer one. Now, I utilise the button after typing things manually. Thanks for letting me know :) Amirul Azimin (talk) 12:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Given the time that you have been away, and the unproblematic editing on your new account, I think we may have a way forward here. Unless the blocking admin objects (I'll leave the blocking admin a note on their talk page shortly to see if they have any thoughts on this), I would be open to entertaining an unblock of you with a one-account restriction. This means that you will be indefinitely limited to operating a single account; you may either use this one, or your new one, but you will have to pick. Would you be willing to accept this as a condition of your unblock? — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 02:47, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

I agree and will accept the unblock condition. After careful consideration, I decided to use this account permanently for future contributions to redeem myself of my problematic past. As for my new account, I will fully cease using it on all types of work. Thank you very much for giving me such chance. Amirul Azimin (talk) 03:11, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

@Red-tailed hawk. I have no recollection of this block but I am happy to support this proposal. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:27, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

I'm DFO, and I approve this unblock. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:17, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Welcome back!

Welcome back EtherealDreamscape! We are looking forward to your contributions here on Wikipedia. Pangalau (talk) 11:56, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Thank you very much for the warm welcome :) EtherealDreamscape (talk) 03:31, 26 January 2024 (UTC)