User talk:Ex-oneatf

Thank you for uploading images/media to Wikipedia! There is, however, another Wikimedia Foundation project called Wikimedia Commons, a central media repository for all free media. In future, please upload media there instead (see m:Help:Unified login). That way, all of the other language Wikipedias can use them too, as well as our many sister projects. This will also allow our visitors to search for, view and use our media in one central location. If you wish to move previous uploads to Commons, see Wikipedia:Moving images to the Commons (you may view images you have previously uploaded by going to your user contributions on the left and choosing the 'image' namespace from the drop down box). Please note that non-free content, such as images claimed as fair use, cannot be uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons. Help us spread the word about Commons by informing other users, and please continue uploading!--OsamaK 08:56, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Take your time. Just back and read when you want to upload a free image.--OsamaK 10:48, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Wikiproject

All WikiProjects are in the Wikipedia: namespace - thus Wikipedia:WikiProject Sino-Japanese-Korean relations. Also, do not use external link format for internal links - thus discussion of proposal. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 08:12, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Korean war crimes

I just deleted entire sections of what you wrote in this article. First of all, they were completely nuts and made no sense. Second, you did not cite any of your claims. Please refrain from writing nonsense like that. Good friend100 (talk) 10:18, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Your blind revert is not "discussion". Such contraction does not warrant your disruptive behaviors in Wikipedia. --Caspian blue (talk) 14:43, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Nonsense. What you wrote on my talk page is just your POV. If you want to move the article to the preferred version, open a discussion at the talk page and provide your rationales. There is not such discussion or decision making. --Caspian blue (talk) 14:48, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Ex-oneatf, putting a list of references doesnt work. Cite every piece of evidence that can be challenged. Anyways, I doubt the list you compiled has anything to do with your claims. They are completely ridiculous. Want me to point them out? If this is the way you people think can even the odds with Japanese war crimes, just get out of here and go back to bed. Good friend100 (talk) 10:17, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Korean war crimes

An article that you have been involved in editing, Korean war crimes, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Korean war crimes. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Caspian blue (talk) 22:17, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

NOW we can discuss the issue that you cause and refuse to discuss with others. Burden of proof, reliable source, neutral point of view are the core principals of Wikipedia, so you need to show such to people. Besides, even though your blatantly saying untruth and tendency to making false accusations may not be considered as blockable offends, but I consider your attitude against me are personal attacks. So please behave yourself well at the discussion page. Thanks.--Caspian blue (talk) 22:17, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

No personal attack

Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Proposals. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Stop the disruption--Caspian blue (talk) 05:46, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Sandbox page

Sorry, I don't think you can have that material in your userspace sandbox either (User:Ex-oneatf/Korean war crimes‎). If it's a copyvio it's a copyvio. Please take this material offline and bring it back only once you have very substantially reworked it.

I'm also not convinced the scope and definition of the topic makes it a legitimate article in the first place, as it weaves some very different historical situations into a "novel narrative" (see WP:NOR, especially WP:SYNTH), but that's a different matter. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:00, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Message to Ex-oneatf and Caspian blue

You have both posted on my talk page so I shall give you both the same message. I have no idea what is going on between you two, and the more I see the less I want to know. I will glady offer my opinions at WP:RfC, WP:AfD, WP:DRV, or any other venue of discussion on Wikipedia. But I will not be drawn into a personal dispute that does not concern me, and I certainly will not take sides. Thank you. PC78 (talk) 15:35, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

You totally ignore the common procedure

So, I don't understand why you even filed the WP:DRV as you're gaming the rule here. That DRV is still ongoing, and your unilateral decision making without consensus is very disruptive. I think you have to notify Fuf about your recreation who deleted the article. That is at least your courtesy. And you should also request the talk page if he thinks the re-creation without confirmation is valid.--Caspian blue (talk) 00:37, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Korean war crimes

From the few sections I've looked at, the re-posted article is still largely plagiarized. Whole sentences are either copied directly from other people's work, or trivially rearranged and altered. Please be aware that making slight changes actually aggravates the problem; it tends to indicate that you know you're doing something wrong, and you're only trying to evade detection. You've already been warned. Please understand that plagiarism is absolutely incompatible with contributing to Wikipedia. Thanks. --Amble (talk) 00:39, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Great, Ex-oneat, you're repeating your mistake again? Not very impressive.--Caspian blue (talk) 01:01, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Mate, I deleted the article in good faith. That's because I didn't like the text of the article in question. I do not disapprove of the existence of an article called 'Korean war crimes'. Indeed, an article like that might well be suitable for inclusion. It's the copyright violation that's the problem. If you have substantially altered the text (ie rewritten it as an encyclopedia article), then you may repost it. You can also work with other editors to create an article with that name. - Richard Cavell (talk) 06:50, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Comfort women

It's apparent that your additions to the article Comfort women were also tainted by plagiarism (see Talk:Comfort women#Plagiarism in recently added section). You have already had the relevant principles explained to you, and been warned; and since you implied that you have a background in scholarship, surely you must know what constitutes original writing. At this point, I have to regard all your contributions as likely to be tainted. --Amble (talk) 02:14, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

I've blocked you for 31h for repeated persistent plagiarism, but also for the overall disruptive tendentiousness of your editing. You are clearly here to further an agenda of systematically minimizing negative information about one nation and maximizing negative information about another, which makes your editing fundamentally incompatible with the goals of our project. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:11, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Copy of Korean War Crimes article

hi.

could you mail me a copy of the Korean war crimes article? I asked Future Perfect at Sunrise but they ignored me underlining the likelihood that deeper prejudices are at play here.

I think censorship, which is what I suspect is going on here, stinks. I have been through it in my own area.

It might be better just to start with a stub and build one up slowly.

wikispam2008@gmail.com

TIA --Lucyintheskywithdada (talk) 08:37, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Blocked as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. (blocked by –MuZemike 02:39, 20 March 2010 (UTC))
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Proposed deletion of File:Korean massmurder.jpg

The file File:Korean massmurder.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 24 January 2020 (UTC)