User talk:Exander2008
{
Exander2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I never knew of this rule. Obviouslly I do now anbd will follow it. I realized I had two screenames just a while ago. I actually do not know how it happened and wanted to resolve it. I had no reason to have two accounts and never wanted to. Could someone please reactivate Exander2008 so that I can continue to edit. I have done nothing really nefarious it was just an accident.
Decline reason:
If you honestly did not realize you had created three accounts and used them all to edit the same articles, you lack the required level of competence to edit Wikipedia. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:25, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Exander2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Please reconsider. I am competent enough to edit Wikipedia. I have a degree in POlitical Science. You can google me my name is Alexander La Forgia. I understand what the problem is, multiple accounts. I will only use Exander2008 from now on. Again, I did not know of this rule and I will surly follow it accordingly now. Also, it wasn't that I did not know I had these accounts, it was that I just had an oversight and accidentally used the worng one a couple of times. I didn't know it was a problem until now. Please, I will ameliorate the problem by just using Exander2008. Can you please unblock this account from editing now?
Decline reason:
I can not believe that anyone can accidentally create three accounts without knowing that they have done so. Before considering an unblock we need a believable explanation for this phenomenon. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:38, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- I'll leave your latest request for another admin to review, but I have to say that somewhere in here you are either being dishonest or exceptionally clueless. I can't imagine how a person could accidently create three accounts when they only ever intended to have one, or how you could think you were logging into to an existing account when you were really creating a new one. That just doesn't make any sense. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:38, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
Exander2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I believe the resaon I created a second account was to have a fresh start, and a new name. I actually scrapped the idea, realizing it could be taken the wronjg way. I accidentally mixed the two names up later. I had no idea it was against wiki policy. I can assure you I will not make the mistake again, and will stick with my original Exander2008 from now on. I understand that it is against the policy and will stick with the policy. So, I ask again to please unblock me, Exander2008. Thank you.
Decline reason:
I'm confused. First you say you only had two accounts, and only realized that a short while ago. Then you didn't know you had them at all. And now you intentionally created one for a "fresh start", which doesn't make any sense either since you've never been blocked before now. And looking at your contributions, you've obviously been editing with two of these accounts simultaneously for over a month, which blows all three stories out of the water.
Here's an idea. Make up one story, that actually makes sense, and tell us that, and then we'll see. (Here's a hint: that story's called the truth.) Hersfold (t/a/c) 18:14, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Exander2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have told the truth. I created a second account in the past to have a fresh start. Its your choice to belive me or not. I later decided I didn't even want to use it. I used it recently by accident since the names are so similar. Will you give me a chance here? I have said I will adhere to the rul and only use Exander2008. Can you give me a break and reinstate it?
Decline reason:
Nothing of the above adequately addresses the problem that you abused three accounts in violation of WP:SOCK, as per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Exander2008/Archive. Talk page access removed for abuse of the unblock process. Sandstein 21:59, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
It is not appropriate for me to repeat a decision in an unblock case, so I will leave that to another admin. But it would be helpful if you could explain why you felt that you needed a fresh start. And why, thereafter, you used both accounts simultaneously. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 20:39, 10 September 2010 (UTC)