User talk:FIRSTORIE
|
I make similar change to Shanghai-Hongqiao#Airlines and Destinations which is be similar to Shanghai-Pudong. Can you improve Hongqiao? Thank you for the assistants!
- I improve from last time which we have some minor conflicts. --B767-500 (talk) 06:28, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
Your edits[edit]
Is there any particular reason why you are removing sources for new services. Per WP:AIRPORTS content, new services should be referenced. When you make updates to a page please don't remove the sources unless the airline has already started the route (MU/SFO and DL/SEA are future services and they are already sourced). regards! Snoozlepet (talk) 05:46, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
MK SIN-PVG segment[edit]
The flight stops in Singapore but the airline doesn't have traffic rights on that segment (it cannot be bookable on their website). Therefore it shuld not be a destination. Snoozlepet (talk) 14:18, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
Pudong AIrport[edit]
We list the destination as Maurtius as per previous discussions on this matter. United's flight to Guam are ocassional charters which cannot be found diretly on united.com. 68.119.73.36 (talk) 20:32, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
Shanghai Hongqiao International Airport[edit]
Hello! I have noticed that you edited the page of Shanghai Hongqiao International Airport and removed Zhuhai Jinwan Airport away from the list of the destinations of China Eastern Airlines. The flight between the airports above can be found on the China Eastern's website. Please do not remove it unless you find the authentic information.--Dennislyh (talk) 04:54, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
Air China flight between PVG and Munich[edit]
You added that Air China is to launch flights between Pudong and Munich starting June 6, 2014. I have removed it unless you can provide a source (also, Air China's website has no flights between Munich and Pudong on June 6, 2014 and the only nonstop flights listed are flights operated by Lufhansa and with 1 or more stops). 68.119.73.36 (talk) 19:43, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)