User talk:FSX-2007

Hello, FSX-2007. You have new messages at Faithlessthewonderboy's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Welcome!

Hello FSX-2007! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Belovedfreak 18:12, 3 July 2007 (UTC) Getting started Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Kiss, Kiss Deleted

The article Kiss, Kiss has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. MastCell ^Talk 16:57, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Ayoleftz

See WP:BALL, if they aren't confirmed, they don't get listed. I think I know what I am doing here, no offense. Also if you don't quit adding the non-sourced information I will report you for vandalism. --Ayoleftyz 14:42, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

That isn't a CONFIRMED source. That is just a video from TRL showing some random tracks on a piece of paper. That is not CONFIRMED as the track list, thus being the reason you should look at WP:BALL. --Ayoleftyz 18:41, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Someone initially changed it to that citing the reason being that Chris Brown confirmed on 106 & Park. I left and added citation tags which I even said shouldn't really be done but gave some slack. As for the track list, do not post it again unless the source is reputable and confirms those tracks will be on the album, in that order. --Ayoleftyz 18:49, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Haha, save your time as I said it will be deleted and you will be reported for vandalism. I am deleting because the tracks are not confirmed. Track list confirmation comes from Amazon, iTunes etc... And they have to be materialized. --Ayoleftyz 18:56, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Those tracks are CONFIRMED. Look at the refs by the column heading, "Title". Do you realize you have to have sources which CONFIRM information for it to be listed? Otherwise Wikipedia would be completely false in every way with people just adding information they want to add. Those tracks have SOURCES that they are CONFIRMED. And as for "the baddest thing in this place", I am not trying to be that or "hard-headed" you just have to understand that what you're doing is considered vandalism and not appropriate. --Ayoleftyz 19:01, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

You don't seem to understand how Wikipedia works. You need REFERENCES or SOURCES to confirm information. What you're doing is giving a source for something that isn't confirmed and you even say it yourself. "Note: This is not the official track listing for the album, only a list of recorded songs from it, as seen on MTV's TRL oo June 1, 2007." That is the epitome of WP:BALL. The track listing should not be listed at all as it's unreferenced information that can't be predicted, hence why they say "Wikipedia is not a crystal ball." My tracks however are CONFIRMED by Chris Brown himself. If you click my two sources next to the column-heading name "Title" you will see this for yourself. --Ayoleftyz 19:11, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

How am I not right? I have sources which Chris Brown CONFIRMS that those tracks will be on the album. The video which you post has Chris Brown in the studio with a piece of paper which lists tracks, so you tell me how that "pretty much confirms" they're on the album? Even if that was the case, pretty much doesn't do it, hence the reason for WP:BALL. --Ayoleftyz 19:17, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Why are you deleting the tracks that have been confirmed? For the last time, if you just read the references which are listed/cited by the column-heading titled, "Title" (click the numbers, then click the highlighted reference) you will see that they have been confirmed by Chris Brown himself in written text or some form. He either confirms in his interview with MTV, his fan club confirms in a post (yes it's a fan club but he even confirms that he organized the "single picking" contest with his fan club in the video which he appears on 106 & Park), or he cofirms in the appearance on 106 & Park. Do you not understand confirmed or what? I'm confused. --Ayoleftyz 20:16, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

WP:AIV

Hello, the user you just reported to WP:AIV has not participated in vandalism and it is a content dispute. Please find other means to settle the matter.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 23:59, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Blocked

Both you and User:Ayoleftyz have been blocked for a 3rr violation on Exclusive (album) for 24 hours.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 00:07, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Chris Brown - Exclusive

You said, "No, you added the WRONG times. Do not edit them again. Check the references before you go changing things."

First of all, I added the RIGHT times. Perhaps YOU should check your sources. Second, I am free to edit the times if I please. You do not own this article or any other article, so you have no right to tell me what I can or cannot edit. Admc2006 06:00, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

P.S. Sign your name after you leave a message as you forgot to do so on my talk page.

Don't come at me with that bullshit you just tried to pull, aight. I told you before the time was CORRECT. Calling me a jackass will get you nowhere. And once again, sign your damn name on my talk page!! Admc2006 06:46, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

What the hell are you talking about? One, Lil Wayne IS featured on that song. Two, leaked or not, this fact was shown on the Amazon.com webpage. If you took the the time to actually LOOK at my sources instead of undoing them as fast as you could, you would have known this. Three, YOU are changing sourced material, not me. You keep this ignorant shit up and it is YOU who will be reported. Four, learn how to spell! It is "sourced", not "courced". LOL Admc2006 07:45, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

P.S. You forgot to sign your name again. Admc2006 07:47, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Okay let me ask you this: you say anyone can send in a fake track listing to Amazon, Wal-Mart, Circuit City and not SONYBMG.de? Answer this: HOW THE HELL DO YOU KNOW THIS? How do you know the track listing on SONYBMG.de is not fake or outdated? You say anyone can send in a fake tracklisting, how do you do they did not do this with SONYBMG.de? You did not think about that, did you? Plus, SONYBMG.de is in German! Unless you are fluent in German, you hardly have any idea what the hell they're saying. Not everyone can read German. An American website is better and easier to understand than a foreign one. Admc2006 08:18, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

P.S. You STILL did not sign your name. LOL

Translator or not, Wikipedians come to read and check sources, NOT translate them. By the way, you did not answer the previous question: how do you know the tracklisting on SONYBMG.de is not false, since you say that anyone can send in a fake tracklisting? Admc2006 08:39, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

P.S. Do you not know how to sign your name? LOL

You say Sony wouldn't let anyone send in fake info? Then tell me, why does SONYBMG.de have a link to the German Amazon website (you know, the website that you said anyone can send in a fake tracklisting)? How do you explain that? Admc2006 08:59, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

I was not talking about the damn album! I was talking about the tracklisting, the one YOU said was flawless because it was on a foreign website. And by the way, you said on the talk page that info was taken from MTV and Amazon (the latter, of which you said, was fake and said could be sent by anyone). YOU get some damn common sense! You contradict yourself. Admc2006 09:10, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

I've said it before, and I'll say it again: YOU CONTRADICT YOURSELF! Earlier, you said no one can send a fake track listing to Sony. Now you are saying they can? Can they or can't they. Make up your mind! Admc2006 09:20, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

P.S. Signature? LOL

One, the track listing you provided was off by two tracks. So much for "reliable" sources. Two, even if the leaked version is without Lil Wayne, that does not mean it's the final version. You even said so yourself that a leaked version does not necessarily mean the final version.[1] You contradicted yourself yet again. And three, you still did not sign on my talk page. Admc2006 07:01, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Damn, you just can't let this go, can you? Way to show off your level of maturity. If you looked at the page, you would have seen that I fixed that. Oh, and before you come at me with an I-told-you-so message, whatever happened to "Lil Wayne is not on that song. It leaked and he is nowhere to found"? Hmmmmm? You didn't forget about that statement you made earlier while you were busy trying to gloat, did you? Admc2006 04:09, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Sure can't let it go when I knew I was right all along. And my bad. Yes, I see Wayne is on the album. I can admit that.

Fine, whatever. You were right about the time, and I was right about Wayne being on the album. Admc2006 04:25, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

P.S. You did not nominate that Double Up for deletion properly. If you want to do so you must follow all three steps to list it, in that order.

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 07:22, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Help Request

Hi there. What is the correct album name? --Bfigura ^(talk) 03:37, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Ah, I see. It's not known. (Or so it seems). If more information becomes available a new article can be created, or this one can be moved. --Bfigura ^(talk) 03:40, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

What did you want to do? If you know the correct name, the article can be moved. Otherwise, I'm not sure what needs to be done. Best, --Bfigura ^(talk) 04:06, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

So is this title incorrect? (Or just based on rumor, so it might be?). In either case, I'm going to bed soon, so I'm not going to undertake any action that might be controversial. (There seem to be a number of IP's editing the page). If you want, you can suggest a move on the talk page, and if no one objects, feel free to move it. Best, --Bfigura ^(talk) 04:37, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Double Up

I noticed that you tagged the page Double Up (song) for speedy deletion with the reason "This is not single. The page does not need to exisit.". However, "This is not single. The page does not need to exisit." is not currently one of our criteria for speedy deletion, so I have removed the speedy deletion tag. You can use Wikipedia:Articles for deletion if you still want the page to be deleted. Thanks! Admc2006 03:01, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Backing me up

Hey thankyou for backing me up with ushers confirmed singles lolTrimy67 01:05, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Music For Love

I have nominated Music For Love, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Music For Love. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. faithless (^speak) 23:53, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

AfD

Hi FSX-2007,

I wanted to explain why I nominated an article you created for deletion. The notability guideline for music states that most songs do not warrant an entire article about them. And since the single in question hasn't even be released yet, I don't think this one is an exception. Please be assured that there is nothing personal implied by my nomination. If you have any comments or questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. Cheers, faithless (^speak) 00:10, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Music For Love

Welcome to Wikipedia. It would be appreciated if you would not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Music For Love. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Admc2006 (talk) 16:14, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Diamond Princess vs. Da Baddest Bitch

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Diamond Princess vs. Da Baddest Bitch, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Diamond Princess vs. Da Baddest Bitch. Admc2006 (talk) 15:47, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Diamond Princess vs. Da Baddest Bitch

An article that you have been involved in editing, Diamond Princess vs. Da Baddest Bitch, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diamond Princess vs. Da Baddest Bitch. Thank you. Admc2006 (talk) 00:44, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Leave me alone and mind your own business. I can add anything I want. Keep up your behavior and I will report you for harassment and gross incivility. IceT13TSOSIM —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.1.186.165 (talk) 09:15, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Love in This Club

Per WP:CHARTS, please do not add chart information from store-specific charts, such as the iTunes Store. Thanks. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 23:05, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Pleasure P's untitled solo album

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Pleasure P's untitled solo album, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Pleasure P's untitled solo album. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 20:24, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Pleasure P's untitled solo album

An article that you have been involved in editing, Pleasure P's untitled solo album, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pleasure P's untitled solo album. Thank you. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 22:15, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)