User talk:Falconhurst1967

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Falconhurst1967, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Onorem 11:50, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Julian T. Jackson[edit]

A tag has been placed on Julian T. Jackson, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. BlackBear 15:57, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Your edit to Norma Kitson[edit]

Message posted on Monday, April 9, 2007[edit]

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Norma Kitson. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (http://news.independent.co.uk/people/obituaries/article180040.ece in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Norma Kitson with a link to where we can find that note;
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Norma Kitson with a link to the details.

It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:Norma Kitson/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:Norma Kitson saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Your original contributions are welcome.

--Onorem 11:50, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Preview[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thanks again. --Geniac 19:15, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Albert_Ernest.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Albert_Ernest.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:55, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - The {{OR}} tag was, perhaps, too hasty. However, the article still contains many sections that draw conclusions from the available facts, which is unencyclopaedic. As you appear to be vested in the article, I'm more than happy to give you time to whittle it down yourself. The same would go for Roderick Kedward, and your other lengthier (albeit thorough) contributions. - Tiswas(t/c) 14:19, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted your recent blanking - this is considered vandalism, even if the blanking is committed by the original contributor. Rather than a perfunctory deletion of all that you have written, why not engage in an informed defense of your edits. - Tiswas(t/c) 15:38, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Two World Wars, One World Cup on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. - Tiswas(t/c) 14:23, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

April 2007[edit]

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ffm talk 15:34, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia articles are created under the GPL. As such, by creating an article, you are effectively permitting its irrevocable and perpetual use on this, and other, sites. Although IANAL. It would be nice if you would reconsider your position - Tiswas(t/c) 15:42, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Albert Ernest Kitson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --Savant13 16:09, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Everton F.C.[edit]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SenorKristobbal 21:14, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Falconhurst1967! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 943 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Roderick "Rod" Kedward (historian) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Julian T. Jackson - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. Martin Thomas - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  4. Jill Kitson - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:52, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Clive Emsley for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clive Emsley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clive Emsley until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 17:42, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]