User talk:Fezmar9/Archive 4

Greetings!

Hello! I previously began updating album pages with review scores from the website I represent and others while I wasn't signed in, and you reverted my edits. Why is that? HBIH are professional reviewers who get advance promotional copies directly from record labels for review. If sites like Metalsucks can be included, I don't see why Heavy Blog can't, unless there's something I overlooked in the guidelines. I'm not being confrontational or anything, I'm sincerely curious. You're obviously an experienced editor and I just wanted to know what was wrong specifically!

Thanks a lot! JRowe3388 (talk) 22:59, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for dropping by my talk page to discuss the matter. I originally reverted all of your edits because I saw an unregistered user adding the same blog site to a dozen or so album articles. Generally when this happens, it's either an author of the site, or someone affiliated with the site through other means, who is aiming to promote their site/blog. This is called spam linking on Wikipedia, and it's frowned upon by the community.

But spamming aside, HBIH does not appear to meet Wikipedia's reliable source guideline or WikiProject Album's guidelines for professional reviews. The blog seems really new and staff seems really young and inexperienced. It's not like Rolling Stone was considered an authoritative source after the first issue was printed. I have opened up a community discussion here and I encourage you to present your argument there. Here are three examples[1][2][3] of previous discussions so you can see what kind of evidence you may be required to provide in order to convince the community HBIH is considered professional. Fezmar9 (talk) 23:47, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	Metalpunk Barnstar
	I award you this barnstar for your hard work improving several not-so-metal-related articles. Keep up the good work! Malconfort (talk) 13:48, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Hahaha, I love it. Thank you. Fezmar9 (talk) 07:24, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Bayonet (band) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bayonet (band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bayonet (band)(2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bgwhite (talk) 07:30, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

2011 in heavy metal music

I hope my explanation of the revert in the edit summary is acceptable. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 22:24, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

I opened up a discussion at 2011 in heavy metal music#Lumping refs in reflist template and notified the article's primary editor to weigh in. Fezmar9 (talk) 23:05, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Lulu_(Lou_Reed_and_Metallica_album)

"the track listing template doesn't make sense in this situation"????? What??? A track list template makes sense where there is any track listing. It's a lot tider and offers a lot more information than manually added information. What do you plan to do when the album is release and it has different people writing the music and lyrics? And has notes for different tracks eg featuring John Smith or something? Without a template you will just make a mess of the page with notes all over the place. The point of a template is to make information tidy and readable. 124.168.213.185 (talk) 23:35, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Let's move this discussion to the article's talk page where other editors of that article can weigh in. Fezmar9 (talk) 00:18, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:InFlames-SoundsofaPlaygroundFading.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:InFlames-SoundsofaPlaygroundFading.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:44, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MudvayneSELFTITLED.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MudvayneSELFTITLED.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:22, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Fezmar9/Archive 4! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/USEDfan

I've asked for some more info, could you provide it please? Alexandria (talk) 18:02, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Underoath discography

So the link took you right to the Underoath discography? If not, please remove the edit as it's not a direct link, which is what's required. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:35, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

No, the link took me to a search page. The featured articles Audioslave discography and Faith No More discography link directly to the RIAA's search page, and the ref in question at Underoath discography was copied and pasted directly from the certification of a different album in the same article, yet no one since 2008 objected to that citation. When you type in a search at the RIAA Searchable Database, the results turn up within the same URL. I know that there is a way to link directly to the results, as has been done for Slipknot discography, but I do not know how to do this. However, I hope you can agree that linking to search page where any rationally thinking person would realize all they have to do is type in "Underoath" is far better than removing the citation altogether. This removes the information's venerability and leaves it open to being challenged or altered. Because linking to the search page is done in numerous other discographies, I'm going to guess it's not that big of an issue. However if you still feel this a problem that needs to be addressed, I'd take it up with WP:CHARTS or WP:DISCOGS and suggest providing some sort of instruction on how to link to the search results, because I don't think it's obvious how to do it. Before responding to your comment, I've even spent a few minutes playing with the advanced search results option with zero success. If you're aware of how to link directly the search results, perhaps you could fix the link in the article and also inform me on how it's done so I can avoid this problem in the future. Thanks. Fezmar9 (talk) 03:15, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:EmeryWHILEBROKENHEARTSPREVAIL.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:EmeryWHILEBROKENHEARTSPREVAIL.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:35, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sleigh Bells - Reign of Terror cover.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sleigh Bells - Reign of Terror cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:02, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Deathwish Inc. discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rise and Fall (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

User talk:Ant smusher

You've been mentioned there, and not in a good way. Abhijay (☎ Talk) (✐ Deeds) 16:20, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up, but those comments are quite old. AntSmusher and I have since buried the hatchet. Most new editors tend to get a little upset when you tell them that what they thought was a free and open world to do whatever they choose actually has quite a lot of rules and guidelines. And actually, most of the comments are from someone who I made sure stayed banned. Fezmar9 (talk) 18:19, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Deftones and post-metal

Hi, I've write an in-depht summary of the reasons to add post-metal to Deftones infobox, i also explained all the sources, I know that you already acepted the consensus for their albums, your opinion will be important here.

• Deftones talk page: [4]

-Trascendence (talk) 03:37, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Did you know nominations/Parabellum (band)

Hi. Please shed some light here.--Malconfort (talk) 15:49, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I don't know how much help I'd be. It looks like Dahn brings up some valid points. The first hook appears to be an opinion quote presented as fact, and the second hook doesn't appear to have an attribution. Unless this is explicitly stated in the Terrorizor article, I don't think you have much of a case. Fezmar9 (talk) 23:01, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Bring Me The Horizon talk page

Hey there, sorry to bother you. But I'm inviting editors to contribute to this discussion on the Bring Me the Horizon talk page. Care to weigh in again if you have time? An editor seems to disagree about the use of a genre in the article, whether or not you agree with me is irrelevant in this post. I believe this discussion needs additional editors to build consensus. Thanks. Jonjonjohny (talk) 17:28, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Crosses and Witch house.

You were involved in the discussion here a while back. Another editor has been removing the genre from the infobox and has eventually posted on the talk page. Any chance you could comment on the issue? Regards. HrZ (talk) 16:19, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cancer Bats Pentagram Tour.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cancer Bats Pentagram Tour.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:35, 11 May 2012 (UTC)