User talk:Fogonthedowns

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Fogonthedowns, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! :) Dlohcierekim 04:05, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article you created was listed for deletion as An article about a real person that does not assert the importance or significance of its subject, criterion 7 in the criteria for speedy deletion, Articles section. Since it appears to be about you I've moved it to your user space instead, which was probably what you intended in the first place (a common mistake among newcomers!).

If you really did mean to create an article about yourself please be aware that this is often considered a bad idea, even if you do meet the guidelines for inclusion of biographies.

I know Wikipedia can be confusing for new editors, so you are welcome to ask for help at the help desk or on my talk page. --PFHLai 05:11, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Owens Affordability.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Owens Affordability.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:06, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV[edit]

Thank you for expanding the article Owens Community College. I'm concerned, though, that the article has become too biased toward its subject. Please read our neutral point of view policy, which is one of our most important policies. Thank you. Chick Bowen 03:34, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Weston2.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Weston2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:33, 30 December 2006 (UTC) Do you live in Weston? Because I doMichael Cook 21:08, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Weston2.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Weston2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih (talk) 03:06, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Valence bond programs[edit]

I have reverted your inclusion of Rubychem in the Valence bond programs as I do not see that it carries out calculations "for modern valence bond calculations, which is what the first line of the article states. I suggest you take it to the talk page if you can demonstrate that your code does actually do modern VB calculations. I also note that you are an author of this code, as I am an author of VB2000. We both have a potential for conflict of interest here. I try hard to avoid that. VB2000 clearly is used for modern VB calculations. It is not clear that Rubychem is, but I am open to being convinced. However modern VB is so complex that it could hardly be done using Ruby. --Bduke (Discussion) 22:47, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Click on the link. It clearly performs cals on valence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.156.0.88 (talk) 22:51, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Calculations on valence" are one thing. Calculations using modern valence bond theory are quite another. Modern valence bond theory is the approximate solution of the molecular Schrödinger equation using the valence bond method. It is a quantum chemistry method. Read Modern valence bond theory. Does Rubychem do what is described there? --Bduke (Discussion) 23:17, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rubychem for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rubychem is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rubychem until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

SL93 (talk) 19:26, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]