User talk:Fortynateyate

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fortynateyate (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What reason do you have to believe that I am a sock of "User:Rod Dreher"? I am not Wilerch, and since Wilerch was an obvious newbie around here I doubt he was the same as User:Rod Dreher either. You have no sufficient proof I am a sock either.

Decline reason:

Per comment below and linked evidence. — Daniel Case (talk) 14:15, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you are unblocked, what constructive edits do you intend to make? Please reply below. —C.Fred (talk) 05:07, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

- I don't know yet, but I don't intend to suddenly leave the whole Rod Dreher thing alone until you show some respect to someone Wikipedia promoted the slander of. Going by the page-move last night on Talk:Rod Dreher, it's obvious people are still out to get him. Fortynateyate (talk) 05:10, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

- - WP:ANI#What shall we do about this editor?. Ongoing sock issue. seicer | talk | contribs 05:12, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Yep. Vandalism happens. We clean it up as quickly as possible. You'll notice that the page is now protected against moves to prevent further malicious moves. Given that several eyes are on the Dreher article now (including mine: it's on my watchlist) so vandalism can be cleaned up readily by other users, what other ways would you contribute to Wikipedia? —C.Fred (talk) 05:13, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever I decide to contribute at the moment. Fortynateyate (talk) 05:15, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No responses yet?? Fortynateyate (talk) 05:26, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's not a specific answer. Daniel Case (talk) 06:19, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)No, because you only gave us 10 minutes (we're volunteers and most of the active crowd are asleep now), and because you haven't really answered the question. What other ways would you contribute if unblocked? Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 06:20, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This editor was likely responsible for the BLP vio in the first place [1] confirming my original theory [2]. Don't even think about unblocking. 67.187.92.105 (talk) 13:54, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:White nationalism[edit]

Template:White nationalism has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 07:07, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]