User talk:Frankirosenthal1002

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]

Hello! Frankirosenthal1002, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Td ^she ^/her 17:43, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Memories of My Father, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 14:57, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022[edit]

Hello Frankirosenthal1002. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Frankirosenthal1002. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Frankirosenthal1002|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Nardog (talk) 01:11, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I am not being paid to edit this Wikipedia page. It is a film that is being released that the company I work for is distributing. I am editing the page because some of the information listed was incorrect and needed to be updated. Frankirosenthal1002 (talk) 16:52, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just so you know, that actually can count as paid editing. I added the required template for you. Please take a look at Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:41, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:MemoriesOfMyFather Poster Web V2.jpg[edit]

Hi! If you want to keep the poster of the movie that you uploaded on Wikimedia Commons it might be necessary to send a mail to permissions-commonswikimedia.org to confirm that you are the copyright holder of the poster and that you intend to release it under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.

Otherwise, you risk having it being deleted from Wikimedia Commons Please see here Trade (talk) 22:23, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of content from Persian Lessons[edit]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Natebailey (talk) 12:05, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Film posters[edit]

Per WP:FILMPOSTER, an infobox's film poster should be of the original theatrical release. So please do not replace posters for foreign films with your company's U.S. release posters.

It is also worth noting WP:FILMRELEASE and other template documentation to understand what information should be in the infobox and what should not be.

You should also not change plot summaries to unencylopedic blurbs written in a promotional tone. Οἶδα (talk) 05:33, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]