User talk:Frasor

Welcome, from →Journalist >>talk<<[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Frasor, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! →Journalist >>talk<< 23:36, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Alf[edit]

Looks like an edit conflict or something - saw the new page - Paul fusco and did a page move to Paul Fusco, but a glitch occurred. I see you are still working on it so will leave be now. Also, welcome to Wikipedia! Vsmith 23:44, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

August Kubikek[edit]

On the Talk:August Kubizek you said: I have added this sentence to the article: "It has been speculated by some historians, like Lothar Machtan, that Kubizek carried out a homosexual relationship with Hitler, but this claim is unanimously dismissed by mainstream scholarship." Hopefully this will be satisfactory.

I have searched but have not found a single scholar who dismissed Professor Machtan's claim. On the contrary, I found eminent scholars such as the respected German historian Dr. Brigitte Hamann who supported his conclusions. Wikipedia policy requires that sources be provided, therefore I am reinstating my text but please reinsert references to any mainstream scholars who dismissed Dr. Machtan's findings. Karl Schalike

Just a friendly tip[edit]

Remember to always sign all of your posts on talk pages. Typing four tildes after your comment ( ~~~~ ) will insert a signature showing your username and a date/time stamp, which is very helpful. --Closedmouth 10:21, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lawrence Auster[edit]

The article Lawrence Auster has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This BLP lacks independent, reliable sources to verify any of its contents or assertions, and the subject does not appear to meet the notability criteria for inclusion.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nathan^T 18:31, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lawrence Auster for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lawrence Auster is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lawrence Auster until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ascendingrisingharmonising (talk) 18:53, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]