User talk:Futuremind123

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Futuremind123, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 03:12, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mansfield Smith-Cumming may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Dukes|Paul Dukes]], [[John Buchan, 1st Baron Tweedsmuir|John Buchan]], [[Compton Mackenzie]] and [[W. Somerset Maugham]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:12, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015[edit]

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Human rights abuses in Jammu and Kashmir does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Kautilya3 (talk) 19:09, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Human3015^TALK 19:19, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Yasin Malik, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 19:24, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to have done it again today. See WP:RS for the sourcing policies. Sources have to be reliable, not necessarily neutral. If other sources contradict the information, please bring them to the table. - Kautilya3 (talk) 15:37, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Which people are not Aryan?[edit]

Which people are not Aryan?VictoriaGrayson^Talk 23:25, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

World War 3?[edit]

What's this? What are you doing here at Wikipedia? Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 14:10, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have placed a speedy deletion template, as per WP:UPNO and WP:FAKEARTICLE. Futuremind, you have may be an hour or two at the most before an administrator comes to take a look at it. You will need to either clean it up to conform to Wikipedia policies or explain the point of this draft on the talk page of the draft. All the best! - Kautilya3 (talk) 14:23, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Futuremind123, the point/problem with this draft is that it is alarming. Why do you write it? Because all these regional conflicts together may be seen as a "third world war"? You may have a point there, but then, is this your personal point of view, or is it the point of view of a relevant author, or a significant group of people? If not, is it your sincere personal concern? Or are you trying to promote a personal point of view? If so, for what reason? Questions, questions... I hope you understand my concern. Best regards, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 15:05, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]