User talk:GH200

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notice that if you want to talk about or coment on the changers it is at the bottom and User:GH200 is at the top.

September 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Talk:Eminem, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. GFOLEY FOUR!— 02:27, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Recovery (Eminem album), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Recovery (Eminem album) was changed by GH200 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.910745 on 2011-10-09T19:06:28+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:06, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edit to the page Eminem appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Secret account 19:14, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Deuce with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ZamorakO o (talk) 19:39, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My Own Group.[edit]

I'm staring my own group and we are going to change only for good and don't mess with us please join and please have a diferent name for the group.

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Please don't link to your group from articles because a discussion group is not encyclopedic in nature. You will learn the rules in no time.--Natl1 (Talk Page) (Contribs) 02:33, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification[edit]

Hello, GH200. I have noticed that you are promoting a group and posting invitations on article talk pages. I am not sure if you are aware of this, but talk pages are reserved for comments that help improve the article. I ask that such comments be avoided on article talk pages as they are not constructive and are immediately reverted. You are free to use user talk pages for people that you think may be interested. Sincerely, —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 11:49, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I have already founded the WikiProject Eminem, and new members are always welcome to list their names. If you may be interested, let me know. We don't currently have any ongoing projects to work on, but people who love contributing to Eminem are always welcome to join. So it may seem rather redundant for me to lead your group. I may still be interested in joining in the coming days. Thanks. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 09:35, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]


New article creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent contributions. Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft version first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, without the risk of speedy deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. --lTopGunl (talk) 02:04, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]


November 2011[edit]

In general, a person or organization added to a list, as on List of comedians, should have a pre-existing article to establish notability. If you wish to create such an article, please confirm that your subject is notable according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 04:06, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello GH200. I noticed you, or another editor created a Requests for Adminship page under your name, and I was wondering as to what the status of that request might be. Please note that new users are rarely successful at RfA and that the Wikipedia editing community sets an extremely high bar for potential administrator candidates. That being said, I strongly urge you to read Wikipedia:Guide to requests for adminship, Wikipedia:Adminship is not for new users, and Wikipedia:Not now, and ask you to reconsider whether you really do wish to go through with your candidacy; please understand that you stand very little to no chance of passing RfA at this point and that you are strongly discouraged from running for adminship. If you are still intent on running for adminship with that request and are absolutely positive this is what you want, please do let me know; otherwise, I'll go ahead and delete the RfA page for you in about a week or so from today. Eagles 24/7 (C) 02:09, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notability[edit]

Hello, GH200. I understand that it has not been too long you began editing. But you must understand some basic policies for Wikipedia so that articles can be created. For song articles, they are:

  • Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline – This is general criteria that all articles must pass in order to be created. Not all articles are worthy of creation, as some are to sparse in information, lacking reliable sources, or do not have appropriate information (e.g. autobiographies, spam, fancruft).
  • Wikipedia:Notability (music)#Songs – Criteria for song articles to be created. Most songs should have charted on a record chart (such as Billboard Pop Songs) and must have enough coverage from reliable sources. Stub song articles (that is, very uninformative pages) are better off deleted and can be discussed using our Wikipedia:Articles for deletion process.

There are notability guidelines for most topics, so see Wikipedia:Notability for more information regarding this policy.

Thank you.
WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 11:38, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My Group[edit]

--GH200 (talk) 19:42, 17 December 2011 (UTC)I will now opperate my group the changers from my user page since someone deleted the group page. This is now the new head quaters for my group. The talk page too.[reply]

Changers forever!--GH200 (talk) 19:42, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]


______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


The Changers Talk Page[edit]

The Changers talk page begins here. _______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Not sure if troll is trying to hard or is instead just some kid. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.88.85.19 (talk) 04:31, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A cupcake for you![edit]

Happy Birthday! Hope you have a great one. Best, —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 18:34, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What did you think about the deletion notice you received?[edit]

Hi GH200,

In December you received a message about either "Nomination for deletion" or "Proposed deletion" of an article you created. I'd like to ask you a few quick questions:

  1. Was the message helpful? Were the instructions clear and easy to follow?
  2. If not, how do you think the message could be improved?
  3. What do you think about the deletion process in general? Do you understand how to contest a deletion?

You can feel free to answer on my talk page or send me your response by email (mpinchuk@wikimedia.org). (I won't quote you or link your answers to your username if you don't feel comfortable with that.) Your feedback is incredibly useful for improving the content of deletion notifications, so please take a minute to think about and answer these questions. Thank you! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 18:46, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Neo-Juggalo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication that neologism meets the basic notability guidelines for inclusion.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. §FreeRangeFrog 22:49, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Happy new year![edit]

Happy new year!
May 2013 bring lots of happiness and perhaps a change for the better here on Wikipedia.
Hope you have a good 'un. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 03:33, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:54, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]