Jump to content

User talk:GothicEnthusiast

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia, the greatest encyclopedia on Earth! You seem to be off to a good start. Hopefully you will soon join the vast army of Wikipediholics!

You may wish to review the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, as well as the avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages.

Here are some helpful links:

By the way, an important tip: To sign comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments.

Hope to see you around the Wiki! If you have any questions whatsoever, feel free to contact me on my talk page  :)

Joe I 17:32, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Staunton gothic.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Staunton gothic.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:09, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Disagreement with Just to clarify[edit]

I've left a note for Just to clarify regarding our content policies. In future, I would suggest that you carefully phrase your comments in such a manner that avoids escalating a dispute. Also, you could consider using a standard message. Thanks! Addhoc 16:49, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A friendly suggestion[edit]

Hi,

Regarding the Gothic chess article, note that continual unexplained reversions and addition of inappropriate material are both considered disruptive editing. Please consider this before making any further edits to this article; I suggest using the talk page - that's what it's there for. Oli Filth 21:08, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to perform unexplained reverts on the Gothic chess article, I will have no choice but to report you for violating the three revert rule. Oli Filth 21:24, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We need more help[edit]

A person with the AceVentura id is causing havoc on the Gothic chess page. He is known to be "Derek Nalls", a person who slanders anyone who does not like his very unsuccessful "Symmetrical Chess Collection" variants, which are extremely esoteric and unpopular.

I would like to request that AceVentura be denied acces to the Gothic chess page because of his disruptive history. Thanks.

GothicEnthusiast 21:11, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Trice Cartaphilus 2005.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Trice Cartaphilus 2005.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:11, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 14 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule on Gothic chess. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Anthøny 22:37, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK[edit]

Updated DYK query On 31 July, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ed Trice, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Espresso Addict 01:04, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Citations[edit]

Hi,

You recently said at Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2007-08-03_Gothic_chess "adding [citation needed] to the point the article is becoming unreadable, forcing readers to pause every half sentence to refer to something in another section of the page". This is an exaggeration, and the number of citation-needed tags (4) is not unusual. See e.g. Sabbath in Christianity, Radcliffe, Greater Manchester and Obscurantism. See also Labor theory of value, where there are three in the same sentence.

At any rate, this is considered better than the alternative, which is unsupported statements being presented as fact, with nothing to indicate them as such. See WP:Verifiability for the rationale and the standard approach.

Thanks, Oli Filth 19:04, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MedCab request[edit]

Please follow the instructions to file a MedCab request. The request regarding Gothic chess is missing an important template needed for properly listing the case in MedCab related categories and proper operation of the maintenance bot. It will be automatically overwritten the next time the bot runs.

I have moved the current request page to your user space at User:GothicEnthusiast/2007-08-03 Gothic chess so that you can copy and paste the contents into the correct form that will be generated when you follow the directions. --Ideogram 15:34, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

August 2007[edit]

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
    and you must always:
  4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. Hut 8.5 16:40, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Alexis ed suit.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Alexis ed suit.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:00, 22 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 01:00, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]