User talk:Gpeja/Archives/1

Speedy deletions

Hi Gpeja,

Afds typically are closed within 7-10 days as long as there are at least 3 policy-based votes. Afd is a bit slower than speedy, but gets the same results for articles without references. When you tag something for speedy deletion, you should add one of the number and letter codes which specify the speedy criteria you're using. The closest one to your argument for CHIC (electronics) would be A7 -No indication of importance (individuals, animals, organizations, web content, events), but this can only be used for those categories, and cannot be applied to software articles. If you have any questions, let me know. Dialectric (talk) 17:42, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Society for Canadian Women in Science and Technology (July 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Society for Canadian Women in Science and Technology and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 17:20, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello! Gpeja, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 17:20, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kali Linux, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ubuntu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

@DPL bot Thanks for pointing it out. I didn't realize Ubuntu is not only operating system. Thanks, Gpeja (talk) 13:16, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

July 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Association for Progressive Communications may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• title= APC Annual Report - 2000|url=http://www.apc.org/en/system/files/APC_ar2001_EN.pdf|format=pdf]}}</ref>.
• including people who developed the tool, who train in how to use GEM, who are adapting GEM (to increase its applicability to rural ICT4D projects, telecentres, software localisation and ICT

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:43, 25 July 2015 (UTC) @BracketBot Fixed. Thanks for pointing this out. Association for Progressive Communications requires lots of work. It is a big article with lots of information but without good references. I appreciate your help in checking the changes. Any advice is welcome. Gpeja (talk) 02:04, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:United States

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Corvette leaf spring

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Corvette leaf spring. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Google

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Google. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:United States

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Carly Fiorina

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Carly Fiorina. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Conduit (company)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Conduit (company). Legobot (talk) 00:01, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Monsanto legal cases

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Monsanto legal cases. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:United States

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Volkswagen emissions violations

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Volkswagen emissions violations. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Perion Network, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CSR. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks and request

Thanks for helping so much in straightening out Conduit (company).

For the companion article on the old website toolbar business, I was finally able to find sources requested by User: Graeme Bartlett when he split the article and suggested it be renamed to reflect what the product is called by its new owner, Perion Network. The new product is called Perion CodeFuel. I've added a brief paragraph about it, too, as it's evolved. I've done a redraft here: User:BC1278/Perion CodeFuel

I have no COI with Perion, but I do with Conduit, so it's not appropriate for me to directly edit this article either. I notified User: Graeme Bartlett on their Talk page that I found the source supporting the update. But previously, that editor was not very interested in reviewing content related to these articles, even though they decided to split it into two articles - that was never my suggestion. I'm not hopeful, then, that User: Graeme Bartlett will get involved again. The editor seems interested in Wikipedia policy and administrative issues rather than substantive editing of other people's articles.

The article still is filled with problematic sourcing, such as online forums and instruction manuals, which I explain in depth on the Talk page of Conduit (publisher network and platform).

At this point, getting yet another editor up to speed would seem a pretty inefficient, so if you do possibly have time to look at User:BC1278/Perion CodeFuel, I'd very much appreciate it.

Thanks,BC1278 (talk) 16:55, 24 September 2015 (UTC)BC1278

I saw your note on User:BC1278/Perion CodeFuel You're right, Perion Network is not a great article. If you want to keep Conduit (publisher network and platform) under the same title, that's one possibility. There are pros and cons to either approaches. Regardless, there are many issues in the article, no matter the title (from incorrect use of the present tense to very unreliable sourcing). My draft addresses these issues. So no matter the title, these should be looked at, I hope. BC1278 (talk) 21:50, 28 September 2015 (UTC)BC1278

Gpeja Thanks for your work on CodeFuel. It turned out well, I think. One other related article request. You've done a lot here already and I understand if you're interested. When these articles on Conduit were generating a lot of discussion, an editor proposed the article about the CEO Ronen Shilo for deletion based on lack of sources and material. So I did a redraft here: User:BC1278/sandbox An admin in the discussion noted that the redraft was much better, but didn't do the update, which I can't do because of COI. The article was not deleted after discussion, Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ronen_Shilo, but the draft remains unused, which is a waste. It's still quite short, just with more sources and facts, as was requested. I don't want to waste the new work just because the original article wasn't deleted. If you have a chance to edit the redraft and bring it live, since you already know the story, that would be much appreciated. If not, I understand and appreciate your work on everything else.BC1278 (talk) 15:28, 2 October 2015 (UTC)BC1278

Please comment on Category talk:Establishments

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Category talk:Establishments. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Grants:IEG/Wikipedia likes Galactic Exploration for Posterity 2015

Dear Fellow Wikipedians,

I JethroBT (WMF) suggested that I consult with fellow Wikipedians to get feedback and help to improve my idea about "As an unparalleled way to raise awareness of the Wikimedia projects, I propose to create a tremendous media opportunity presented by launching Wikipedia via space travel."

Please see the idea at meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IEG/Wikipedia_likes_Galactic_Exploration_for_Posterity_2015. Please post your suggestions on the talk page and please feel free to edit the idea and join the project.

Thank you for your time and attention in this matter. I appreciate it.

My best regards, Geraldshields11 (talk) 22:07, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Establishments by place

Your comments on the RfC on whether bridges can be considered establishments ignore the fact that for categories like category:1913 establishments in Oregon the category is really being used as Category:1913 establishments and completions of buildings and structures in Oregon but that is just too long a category name, so the shorter name was chosen but still with the broader meaning intended.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:01, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Leschi (fireboat)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Leschi (fireboat). Legobot (talk) 00:01, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Keynesian economics

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Keynesian economics. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Can you review a proposed change?

Hi,

Would you mind doing an independent review of a proposed change to the article Ale Resnik which I can't make myself because of a WP: COI? It's regarding an award/article and requires judgment as to editorial worthiness of a source.

It's the last current entry on Talk:Ale Resnik located here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ale_Resnik&action=edit&section=3

Of course, as always, I understand if it's not of interest.BC1278 (talk) 17:33, 24 October 2015 (UTC)BC1278

Deletion proposal on CodeFuel

Someone put a PROD banner on CodeFuel It's meant for non-controversial proposals for deletion and can be removed by anyone, without discussion. The notability objection in this case seems silly -- the historical aspect of the article alone, with five years of sourcing, justifies it. You might want to bring up to the lead the reference to the CodeFuel product being the renamed and evolved Conduit Connect toolbar business, acquired from Conduit. The platform's historical importance -- it was larger than Twitter just a few years ago and also, controversial - is the main reason it merits an entry. Not the current product. That's my suggestion as a compromise to meet the editor's notability objection.BC1278 (talk) 19:10, 24 October 2015 (UTC)BC1278

Please comment on Talk:Economic history

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Economic history. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

You're invited! Women in Red World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Science

You are invited! Join us remotely! World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Science

Dates: 8 to 29 November 2015 Location: Worldwide/virtual/online event Host/Facilitator: Women in Red (WiR) in collaboration with Women scientists: Did you know that only 15% of the biographies on Wikipedia are about women? WiR focuses on "content gender gap". If you'd like to help contribute articles on women and women's works, we warmly welcome you! Sponsor: New York Academy of Sciences Event details: This is a virtual edit-a-thon hosted by WiR in parallel with a "phyisical" event during the afternoon of Sunday, November 22 in New York City. It will allow all those keen to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women in science to participate. As the virtual edit-a-thon stretches over three weeks, new participants will be able to draw on the assistance of more experienced editors while creating, translating or improving articles on women who are (or have been) prominent in the field. All levels of Wikipedia editing experience are welcome. RSVP and learn more: →here←--Ipigott (talk) 11:15, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Gary Cooper

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Gary Cooper. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Codefuel comment

I have been asked to suggest some changes to the article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CodeFuel and so far there has been no reply. My comment was as follows -

A suggestion. That you move the "Toolbar" subject from the Technology section to History section because it's not a part of the current technology of CodeFuel. It could be placed above the line - "This toolbar is a history behind a current suite of browsing and security applications." Another addition to this section could be - "In August 2014, the company signed a three-year agreement with Bing, Microsoft’s web search engine, extending its existing partnership. The new agreement runs from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2017. In July 2015 the name was changed from Perion Codefuel to Codefuel." References for this are "http://www.timesofisrael.com/perion-extends-microsoft-deal-ups-mobile-business/" and "http://mobilemarketingmagazine.com/perion-extends-app-partnership-with-bing/" Nmwalsh (talk) 09:46, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Socialism

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Socialism. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Wikipediocracy

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Wikipediocracy. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Royal Households of the United Kingdom

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Royal Households of the United Kingdom. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Portal talk:Current events/2015 November 17

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Portal talk:Current events/2015 November 17. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jude Wanniski

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jude Wanniski. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:ExxonMobil

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:ExxonMobil. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Monkey Kingdom

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Monkey Kingdom. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Socialism

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Socialism. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Emma Watson

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Emma Watson. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:John Stuart Mill

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:John Stuart Mill. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Avedis Zildjian Company

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Avedis Zildjian Company. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Alfred North Whitehead

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Alfred North Whitehead. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox company

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox company. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Hilton Worldwide

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Hilton Worldwide. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Assurant

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Assurant. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Accompong

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Accompong. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Philippines v. China

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Philippines v. China. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Truck

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Truck. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:S&P 500 Index

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:S&P 500 Index. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox organization

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox organization. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Paul Singer (businessman)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Paul Singer (businessman). Legobot (talk) 04:24, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of European countries by average wage

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of European countries by average wage. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Gpeja. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sephora

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sephora. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Pioneer Village station

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Pioneer Village station. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Foursquare

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Foursquare. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Brave (web browser)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Brave (web browser). Legobot (talk) 04:25, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Taiwan stations)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Taiwan stations). Legobot (talk) 04:24, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Gpeja. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Feedback request: Economy, trade, and companies request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Tyson Foods on a "Economy, trade, and companies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:30, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Penny Le Couteur (March 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Penny Le Couteur and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Penny Le Couteur, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 09:03, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Gpeja! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 09:03, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Penny Le Couteur

Hello, Gpeja. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Penny Le Couteur, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

You've been unsubscribed from the Feedback Request Service

Hi Gpeja! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the Feedback Request Service, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over six months.

In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in six months.

You do not need to do anything about this - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:

1. Go to the Feedback Request Service page.
2. Decide which categories are of interest to you, under the RfC and/or GA headings.
3. Paste {{Frs user|Gpeja|limit}} underneath the relevant heading(s), where limit is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month.
4. Publish the page.

If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.

Note that if you had a rename and left your old name subscribed to the FRS, you may be receiving this message on your new username's talk page still. If so, make sure your new account name is subscribed to the FRS, using the same procedure mentioned above.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the Feedback Request Service talk page, or on the Feedback Request Service bot's operator's talk page. Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:01, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)