User talk:Grand'mere Eugene/Archives/2022/April
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Nomination of Scott Banister for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scott Banister, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Banister (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Lol
Hey, the last sentence in your comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mount Jewett Charter School Coalition gave me a chuckle. Too true! Graham87 03:37, 12 April 2022 (UTC).
Hello Grand'mere Eugene!
I believe you helped me in the past, would I be able to trouble you again? I've put together a page for a famous animation producer. I think I've added too many references, I'm not sure. Do you have any advice before I publish? Thank you.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ron_Diamond
GreenBlueGreen (talk) 00:44, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
- GreenBlueGreen, it's good see your progress as an editor! On a first pass of the Diamond article, I would advise you to remove any source where Diamond is the subject of an interview, by definition a primary source. It is only acceptable to use a primary source to verify uncontroversial facts, so especially where you have perfectly good secondary sources, just shed the interviews. I'll take another look this evening, and don't hesitate to question/challenge me further! — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 22:02, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
- Grand'mere Eugene, thank you so much for your time and encouragement! I feel more energized to get this page done, thanks to you. GreenBlueGreen (talk) 12:04, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Re: Draft over Redirect, and how to preserve edit history?
Hey, indeed cutting and pasting the new article over the redirect would not have been a good idea. The regular procedure is to do a technical request at requested moves, but I've gone and moved the article to the main namespace myself. Graham87 03:44, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment
Hi, Thank you for your help on my articles! You have been a big help. I really appreciate it. I want to ask you about the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment article that I have been working on. I am hoping it could be promoted from a stub to a B article. How do I request that it be considered for promotion? Leptonsandquarks (talk) 20:57, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, Leptonsandquarks, I'll review it now to see how close we are. Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 21:12, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
- I use an automated program, Rater, which gives it a B rating with 66% confidence level. Good job! Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 21:15, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
- YAY! Leptonsandquarks (talk) 21:55, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
- I use an automated program, Rater, which gives it a B rating with 66% confidence level. Good job! Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 21:15, 26 April 2022 (UTC)