User talk:Greenemaze

October 2020[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Out Here on My Own has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Out Here on My Own was changed by Greenemaze (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951059 on 2020-10-01T05:22:00+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:22, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Out Here on My Own. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 08:27, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Out Here on My Own shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You have now been reverted by two editors and a bot. The material does not meet inclusion criteria. If you continue to add the material without a consensus to do so, you will be blocked from editing. SummerPhD^v2.0 16:53, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been edit warring on this. Based on the warning above and your repeated additions of the material without first establishing a consensus, you are eligible for a short block from editing. As you are obviously new, I am not requesting a block, though another editor might and you certainly could be blocked.

In general, the Bold, Revert, Discuss Cycle is a good way to resolve disputes, avoid edit wars and save the use of blocks for more serious problems.

If you boldly make a change to an article (as you did) and you are reverted (as you were, several times, by more than one editor), it is time to discuss the issue -- not restore your preferred version. While discussion is on-going, the status quo generally remains in place (i.e., the way it was before your change). - SummerPhD^v2.0 20:11, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you’re right. I’m new. Thanks for the message. Appreciate it. Greenemaze (talk) 21:26, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Edipio. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Edwina Bartholomew, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Edipio ^💬 20:50, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]