User talk:Greenhorn38

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Greenhorn38, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 05:01, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edits on South Korea[edit]

Greetings. At least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.

I've asked several times to discuss on the talk page before reverting the edits of other users, as there is a discussion going on there. BlackRanger88 (talk) 02:13, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

You have been recently reverting edits without proper talk page discussion. Consensus will not be achieved if you continue to revert edits without properly explaining your reasons for doing so. BlackRanger88 (talk) 19:24, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing.

On the South Korea page: The map depicting one of the most important periods in Korean History is not a violation of WP:BALASPS and WP:UNDUE. In fact, your improper usage of both reveal that you are either unaware of what they actually say, or that you are intentionally citing them in a deliberate attempt to misinform other editors.

Template:History of Korea page: You failed to provide any reasoning behind your revert (no edit summary)

History of Korea page: The Protectorate is, quite frankly, not even a part of the Three Kingdoms Period. It was founded after the fall of the Three Kingdoms. I've told you before that it does not constitute a main article for the Three Kingdoms subsection yet you continue to add it without explanation.

BlackRanger88 (talk) 19:52, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24h for edit-warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

I appreciate your persistence, but the issue has to be discussed at the talk page rather than to be edit-warred about.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:22, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Collision787 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:27, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]