User talk:Gsmite79

Recent edit to Daryle Singletary[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Daryle Singletary, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 09:14, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Signe Weisert[edit]

Hello. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person (Signe Weisert), but that you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! BlAcKhAt9(9 (talk) 18:44, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016[edit]

This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian again, as you did at User talk:Materialscientist, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mlpearc Phone (open channel) 03:43, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours for harassing other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 03:53, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You need to stop with the "evil satanic blasphemy" and "are you the devil?" stuff right now. Continuation along those lines will get you indefinitely blocked. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 03:56, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 04:11, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have extended your block to indefinite because you show no signs of changing your behavior. [1] You can be unblocked once you agree your posts were unacceptable and you will not repeat them. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 04:15, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unblock me I'm trying to improve an article[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gsmite79 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please Unblock me I understand that I may have insulted "materialscientist" but that was only because he aggravated me by insulting all of hinduism and God himself. in the future I will use better language, but please understand that "materialscientist" was basically spitting on the face of God, and I was just trying to fix an article. your reason here Gsmite79 (talk) 05:24, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As you are continuing your personal attacks here, I have revoked your ability to edit this talk page. See WP:UTRS if you wish to make any further appeal. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:18, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.