User talk:Guinova

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Guinova, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

To keep up to date with interesting news and developments, you may also wish to subscribe to The Signpost, our illustrated monthly newspaper, and have it delivered directly to your talk page.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 00:22, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oscars Trivia Fluff (which I'm partially responsible for >_>)[edit]

Hey Guinova! Sorry, I've been a bit overwhelmed with personal stuff to edit much this past week or so since reviewing stats together. And then that other guy, KeymasterBlade or KeybladeMaster, whatever—apparently he's a sockpuppet! So that was fun. That's also a huge boon however, as he was the one who was continually inflating the article with nonsense like "the five-timers club". I LOVE the Oscars' history (not so much the ass-kissing campaigning), and I know all acting nominees and winners by memory. I'd win an all-Oscars Jeopardy....Someone help me get rich. Anyway. I never heard that term before, surprisingly. And those are 100% the type of "stats" (they are factual) that are so infinitesimal, due to them referencing so much past history. They're based so little on this particular awards ceremony, agreed?

I apologize for being loquacious. Truncation is not my forte! But with that disruptive editing out of the way, we should be able to work together and make good compromises on what stays and goes. We essentially already discussed it and I think are on the same page, but I figured maybe a reassessment might be wise? It's always a relief when there's someone with a nice attitude like you, because on some other articles I could say 4 bullet points and they'll agree with three, but they'll only reply with snide remarks about the one disagreement. And someone else mercifully eradicated the Barbie "snub" section once and for all, which was inevitable. So that's another alleviation of excess! Okay, I'll stop rambling now. Talk to you soon. --Cinemaniac86^Talk_Stalk 20:49, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]