User talk:Gujaratiauthor

Image copyright problem with Image:Harilalupadhyay.gif[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Harilalupadhyay.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 08:55, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Harilalupadhyay.gif[edit]

An image that you uploaded, Image:Harilalupadhyay.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. pruthvi (talk) 21:08, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for donating an image of Shri Harilal Upadhyay under GFDL, indeed he is a great author and his article should carry a good image of him. I am going to remove the copyright violation tag from his image however I am afraid that will not be useful because once marked as copyright violation there should be a reasonable way to decide on whether edits done in the name of Jiten Upadhayay (copyright holder) are indeed done by Jiten Upadhyay. In brief either your web-site should mention that the said image is available under GFDL or you should send an e-mail to wikipedia from the e-mail address shown on your web-site that you are releasing said image under GFDL. Please follow the instruction at following page Copyright_problems#Copyright_owners_who_submitted_their_own_work_to_Wikipedia

Sorry for inconvenience pruthvi (talk) 19:09, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008 (http://spam.harillaupadhyay.org)[edit]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. MER-C 12:41, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing anyone from linking to them from all of Wikipedia. MER-C 12:44, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The link is neither added for promotion nor it is irrelevant. It is only added to the pages where it matters and that also along with some other internal links to wikipedia as well. Let me know if any clarification is needed. Though I am not adding the links to wikipedia any more.

Spam is the systematic addition of external links. That's precisely what you've done. Wikipedia is not a medium for promoting your website. MER-C 13:01, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]