User talk:Hackercraft

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi there. I noticed that you changed the dates from BCE to BC on Aegean civilizations. The wikipedia guideline on this (WP:ERA) suggests leaving dates as they are. RJC TalkContribs 21:48, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Huma Abedin[edit]

Please stop using the article on Huma Abedin as a platform for spreading widely discredited conspiracy theories. Your edits are in violation of WP:BLP and WP:UNDUE. If you continue to disregard these policies, you will find youself blocked from editing Wikipedia. Prolog (talk) 10:37, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015[edit]

Information icon Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to GroenLinks. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 11:16, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Is the guideline at WP:DAB unclear? Disambiguation in Wikipedia is the process of resolving the conflicts that arise when a potential article title is ambiguous, most often because it refers to more than one subject covered by Wikipedia, either as the main topic of an article, or a subtopic covered by an article in addition to the article's main subject. Or from MOS:DABENTRY: Include exactly one navigable (blue) link to efficiently guide readers to the most relevant article for that use of the ambiguous term.. Disambiguation pages are not a glossary. olderwiser 21:11, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kelli Stavast[edit]

Regarding your edit to the Kelli Stavast article, the matter is currently under discussion at the talk page. You may therefore want to add your !vote to the discussion.
As for the referencing, there are far superior references than Twitter. Mikehawk10 has listed no fewer than 13 of them on the talk page. Banana Republic (talk) 22:44, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Banana Republic: The reference was not to a Twitter message, per se. The reference was to video embedded in the Tweet. Unless you are implying that the video itself is bogus, in which case you would need to justify that assertion.Hackercraft (talk) 17:50, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]