User talk:Haseo ATC

June 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Laura Ingraham, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Laura Ingraham was changed by Haseo ATC (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.860117 on 2012-06-24T06:47:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:49, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Joe the Plumber with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 07:04, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chuck Norris, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Chuck Norris was changed by Haseo ATC (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.907498 on 2012-06-24T07:09:48+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:09, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. Someguy1221 (talk) 07:24, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Haseo ATC (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Full reason follows

Decline reason:

The legal threat grounds is just an excuse. Your edits are obnoxious and disruptive, and you've made yourself unwelcome. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 03:46, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I understand being blocked for "disruptive" editing (for Joe the Plumber and Laura Ingram--who does kinda resemble a skeleton, you gotta admit--although I do not remember editing or even visiting the Chuck Norris page). But it is my understanding that the reason for my being blocked indefinitely has to do with the following circumstance: I threatened a BOT with legal action. I respond with the following (copy and paste the link because I don't know how to insert an image on Wikipedia): <http://i3.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/005/545/OpoQQ.jpg>. If you don't know what that means, see <http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/are-you-serious-face-seriously>. Obviously I cannot take any sort of legal action against a BOT. Any lawyer who would represent me in such a lawsuit is probably mentally challenged and probably has never heard of this newfangled contraption called "the internet." I understand what I have done to earn this indefinite block, but I do not believe any sort of apology is in order. I have said this before under other user names and other IP addresses, but most of the big-wig editors on Wikipedia need to lighten up. I recall a time when I added some obviously fictitious content to the pages for "jackalope" and "the blob" and as a result, one very anal-retentive fellow had me blocked and removed ALL edits I had made under that username (which was, except for those two edits, entirely grammatical edits made to dozens of small, random Wikipedia pages in an effort to improve the overall quality of all articles on Wikipedia). Wish I remembered the guy's name, because that was just frickin' messed up. Anyways, pls to unblock moi, as I have installed a breathalyzer onto my Wikipedia user page to prevent further drunken but "hilarious" (note the quotes) edits. Thanks you and good day, sir or madam.

Unblock, round 2: Objection![edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Haseo ATC (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You've got to be f@#king kidding me. Please refer to the links provided in my previous unblock request. Two edits for the sheer hell of it plus a ridiculous legal threat made to a non-human entity equals being "unwelcome" and indefinitely banned? Other, more legitimate edits I've made don't mean anything? (Actually, I'm not sure if those edits were made by my IP address or this username, so that might be my bad.) I would like to speak to your manager, please. And by manager I mean someone in the paid employ of the Wikipedia organization. By email if necessary, so full names can be disclosed. You have not heard the last of me, fiends!

Decline reason:

No, you didn't threat just the bot: "This applies to all ClueBot users." and "I WILL take legal action if another account of mine is banned." are legal threats in general, not specifically directed at the bot. And combined with "You have not heard the last of me, fiends!", I have to conclude that you're up to no good here. Talk page access revoked. Max Semenik (talk) 08:37, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.