User talk:Heonsi

if you wish to appeal your ban, contact WP:BASC by email. 19:36, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

ein tvai drai........ Someone has attempted to revert your edits at East Germany, please join the discussion at the East Germany article The user Mewulwe has reverted your edits, I considered the reversion flawed and reverted his. There is debate about whether it is accurate or biased to state that East Germany was a satellite state of the Soviet Union. I have found a vast array of sources that say that it was a satellite state, but two users are refusing to accept these claims. Please enter the discussion on the issue of satellite state status of East Germany at Talk:East Germany.--R-41 (talk) 17:11, 9 January 2012 (UTC) The Nazi Party emblem is real, it is called the "Partei-Abzeichen" Here are photographs from an official Nazi Party book that shows the symbol, "Partei-Abzeichen" it can be seen in colour and in black-and-white on two pages in the following source see here: [1].--R-41 (talk) 14:12, 14 January 2012 (UTC) Nomination of 2012 Bangladesh uprising for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2012 Bangladesh uprising is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012 Bangladesh uprising until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Basalisk inspect damage⁄berate 18:59, 19 January 2012 (UTC) Mewulwe He/she can remove things from their talk page if they wish. Please don't revert. – Connormah (talk) 03:16, 22 January 2012 (UTC) January 2012 Your recent editing history at The Simpsons shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block. If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. JOJ Hutton 14:33, 22 January 2012 (UTC) Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Swedes, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mutt Lunker (talk) 16:49, 22 January 2012 (UTC) This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at British National Party, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sparthorse (talk) 18:53, 22 January 2012 (UTC) Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to English people, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Radiopathy •talk• 18:59, 22 January 2012 (UTC) You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-llists.wikimedia.org. Daniel Case (talk) 19:10, 22 January 2012 (UTC) please unblock me , give me another chance This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Heonsi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: well yes am a sockpuppet of chaosname but i still want to edit wikipedia so plase unblock me and lol Decline reason: We generally don't unblock sock accounts, and your "lol" at the end of the request certainly doesn't inspire me to make an exception in this case... I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you have been blocked for, will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and will make useful contributions instead. Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:30, 22 January 2012 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Blocked you indefinitely instead--Jac16888 Talk 19:32, 22 January 2012 (UTC)