User talk:Hitwalker

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Nachoman-au 09:28, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to PHP-Nuke. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policy for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Nachoman-au 09:35, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. JonHarder talk 14:51, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, as you did to PHP-Nuke, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing anyone from linking to them from any site that uses the MediaWiki spam blacklist, which includes all of Wikimedia and Wikipedia. Nachoman-au 23:36, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 48 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our polices concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. WjBscribe 22:02, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to what WJBscribe has said, please participate in discussion at Talk:PHP-Nuke -- it should be clear by now that your adding the link is considered controversial, and may constitute a conflict of interest. By discussing the issue with your fellow editors, you can hopefully reach a more conclusive consensus as to whether the link should be included or not. until such a consensus is reached, I will have to firmly request that you avoid linking to the site, given your apparent involvement with it. Thanks. – Luna Santin (talk) 22:03, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked you again for 72 hours for simply re-adding the link without discussing the matter. If you will agree to discussing the issue on the article's talk page, then I will unblock you. Consensus and discussion are key to the functioning of wikipedia. If you're not willing to work towards consensus on the talk page, then you're simply not welcome to participate here. The link you want will not stay in the article by sheer force of will. You may contest this block with {{unblock}} (follow the link for instructions). Good day.--Chaser - T 02:51, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

checkY

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

I've unblocked you to permit discussion of the link in question. In response to some of your questions here, my primary concern is that you weren't responding to any of the spam warnings left on your userpage (the msg you left on the article talk page was deleted before most of these warnings). Please contact one of the editors who left you the warnings to discuss the matter or ask a regular editor of the article at their talk page.

Request handled by: Chaser - T 02:28, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]