User talk:Hmich176/PA Routes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Myselfalso, I hope that you don't mind that I made some updates to your list. I also checked PA 86 as the list requested, and there is no doubt that it is a stub, as it contains no elements of the project structure other than the infobox. --TMF T - C 19:57, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome! That's not a problem. I also moved West Chester Pike to Pennsylvania Route 3. --myselfalso 20:36, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Albertotineo10[edit]

Hey. All the requested shields have been created. Check 'em out!

On another note, Albertotineo10 (talkcontribs) is still creating articles that do not come close to meeting WP:PASH standards. Efforts to contact him about his incorrect formatting through his talk page (as you can see) have gone unnoticed, and I personally think that this issue may require a third party intervention. What that intervention is, I don't know. --TMF T - C 21:14, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'm not sure what to think about him. I hate to discourage this user from creating articles, but indeed, they are totally outside the standards of WP:PASH. I'm not sure where to go about this. I'll take a look and hopefully find out something. I'll stop by the Village Pump. Maybe someone there can help. --myselfalso 21:32, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]




Other stuff[edit]

A question[edit]

When I get to making the page for Pennsylvania Route 299, I know there will be a thing on the bottom of the template that is on for every road page, with a selection that either takes you back to a previous route, in this instance, it would be 296, or the next route. For 299, the next one up would be Pennsylvania Route 300, or PA 283. I tested by previewing edits, but it seems as if the PA shield wont come up for 300.

When I get to it, should I just list the next route as 300 (and hope it gets fixed), or just go ahead and list the next route (301)?

Thanks for the help :) Whammies Were Here (PYLrulz) 09:05, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]