User talk:IamDarshanaD

Welcome![edit]

Hi IamDarshanaD! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternately, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Rajeev Gaur123 (talk) 11:19, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rajeev Gaur123! Thank you for messaging me. Whenever I feel free, I'm learning about Wikipedia little by little. I hope to write a Wikipedia article in the near future using what I have learned and minimizing mistakes as much as possible.

Thanks IamDarshanaD (talk) 13:51, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warakapola moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for creating Warakapola. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Reading Beans (talk) 21:41, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Warakapola has been accepted[edit]

Warakapola, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 21:47, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! I'm really happy to hear that. Thank you for accepting my submission. I will improve my knowledge little by little. And, one day I will become a genius Wikipedia article writer. IamDarshanaD (talk) 22:40, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:IamDarshanaD/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 14:07, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, IamDarshanaD! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 14:07, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KylieTastic! I'm not asking why you declined my Wikipedia user page. I appreciate you declining my user page. It is more important to do so to correct my mistakes. I look forward to continuing this Wikipedia journey of mine, correcting my mistakes. I have something to ask you now. Please provide an answer. Do I need a user page to work as a Wikipedian? IamDarshanaD (talk) 14:47, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A userpage will definitely help you connect better with other Wikipedians. The sandbox page can be restored as long as the part about your business is removed. Userpages should not be used for non-Wikipedia related self-promotion. Jay 💬 16:38, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amila Karunanayake (February 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Amila Karunanayake and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Akevsharma (talk) 03:52, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amila Karunanayake (March 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There is too much unreferenced content, eg. all the private personal details such as DOB and family members are unsupported, and some of the sources (IMDb, YouTube) are non-RS.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Amila Karunanayake and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:19, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:IamDarshanaD/sandbox[edit]

Hello, IamDarshanaD. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:IamDarshanaD/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amila Karunanayake (September 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Loads of references does not mean loads of good references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Amila Karunanayake and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 17:04, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Amila Karunanayake[edit]

Hello, IamDarshanaD. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Amila Karunanayake, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:07, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello FireflyBot. Thank you for reminding me about that page. I will edit it. IamDarshanaD (talk) 09:23, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Amila Karunanayake[edit]

Hello, IamDarshanaD. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Amila Karunanayake".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:51, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]