User talk:Infrogmation/Archive June 2019 - 2022

Archive of discussion from User talk:Infrogmation

Next older archive: User talk:Infrogmation/Archive 2015-May 2019

Next more recent: None at present

Congratulations!![edit]

Hey, Infrogmation. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day! Mjs1991 (talk) 04:34, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:Saint Malo, Louisiana#Blogs are not reliable sources [edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Saint Malo, Louisiana#Blogs are not reliable sources . RightCowLeftCoast (Moo) 05:51, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ragbaby Stephens[edit]

You created this article in 2003. Any idea where this information came from? I know it's been a while.
Vmavanti (talk) 23:57, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
These too:

Vmavanti (talk) 00:00, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Henry Ford (musician) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Henry Ford (musician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry Ford (musician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vmavanti (talk) 18:38, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:MGMRecord45.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:MGMRecord45.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fats Domino recordings[edit]

Hello,

Based on many years of painstaking work on the compilation of discographies as part of a team of enthusiasts of classic rock and roll, I suggest you get acquainted with my first wiki project. If successful, it is planned to create similar pages for Little Richard, Carl Perkins, Charlie Rich, Larry Williams, Jerry Lee Lewis, Esquerita... I apologize for my poor English and would be very grateful for any corrections and improvements to the style, as well as suggestions for improving the structure of the page. Cheers and rock on!

RocknRollArchivist (talk) 19:56, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:KingRecordJapan.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:KingRecordJapan.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:KingRecordJapan.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:KingRecordJapan.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:04, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ragbaby Stephens for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ragbaby Stephens is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ragbaby Stephens until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vmavanti (talk) 00:46, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of New Orleans Records for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New Orleans Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Orleans Records (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vmavanti (talk) 17:13, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Come Clean (rag) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Come Clean (rag) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Come Clean (rag) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vmavanti (talk) 20:19, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Crescent City Records for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Crescent City Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crescent City Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vmavanti (talk) 00:50, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dixieland Records for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dixieland Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dixieland Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vmavanti (talk) 00:52, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:MW 1935[edit]

Template:MW 1935 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Wikiacc (¶) 22:49, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Van Dyke Records[edit]

The article Van Dyke Records has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sources tag for a decade, no sources since creation in 2003. I see a paragraph or so in a very small number of very specialised publications, but probably not enough to meet WP:ORG or to get this beyond a stub.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Now's the time, if you've been sitting on secret sources for this article.... EddieHugh (talk) 20:56, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, @EddieHugh:, I have sources for this. Would you mind sending me the "specialty publications" you found, just in case you've got something I don't? Infrogmation, you got anything? Thanks! 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 22:24, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just the ones from looking at google books. These were probably the ones I saw: [1] and [2]. I found only 1 mention in the books that I have, and that was a passing mention: nothing worth including. EddieHugh (talk) 16:45, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Those two books are known to me, and contain substantial information not found in the Google preview, therefore used. I also knew of some information in Record Research. There's an article in New Amberola Graphic, but unfortunately I'm unable to access it, and I doubt it's an issue I have. Google says it's in issues 138-179, somewhere. Great. Thanks Google. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 17:32, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for rescuing it with the sources that you have. Google's often not much use with those sorts of details; its 'publication' dates for books often look more likely to be the dates of the uploads to their servers. Anyway, I'll leave Infrogmation's talk page – thanks for hosting! EddieHugh (talk) 21:13, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New article: Lycée Français de la Nouvelle-Orléans[edit]

Hi! I just started Lycée Français de la Nouvelle-Orléans, the French international school of the city. Feel free to improve it! WhisperToMe (talk) 22:24, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy[edit]

Hey, Infrogmation. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day! CommanderWaterford (talk) 06:42, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day![edit]

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:00, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:KingRecordJapan.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:KingRecordJapan.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Any Rags?, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Al Lewis. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:47, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ColumbiaLabelBSmith.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ColumbiaLabelBSmith.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ColumbiaLabelBSmith.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ColumbiaLabelBSmith.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ColumbiaLabelBSmith.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ColumbiaLabelBSmith.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why do I need 3 notifications in a row? Also image is now PD. -- Infrogmation (talk) 19:20, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ColumbiaLabelBSmith.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ColumbiaLabelBSmith.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"New Hampshire (motto)" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect New Hampshire (motto). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 24#New Hampshire (motto) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:22, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PICTURE DELETION[edit]

HELLO, I WANTED TO INCORPORATE ABOUT HOW CAN I UPLOAD THE PHOTOS YOU'VE DELETED THE PROPER WAY. I DO NOT WANT TO VIOLATE ANY TERMS OF WIKIPEDIA. I WOULD LIKE FOR MY FIRST DRAFT CONTRIBUTION TO BE APPROVED. PLEASE ALSO LET ME KNOW WHAT I CAN DO TO MAKE SURE MY PAGE IS PUBLISHED. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MITTENSCUBAN (talk • contribs) 06:25, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Wikimedia Commons is only for free licensed (by the author/photographer) or public domain (copyright expired) photos. Just know that most images seen on websites won't fit these criteria - unless the website explicitly states a specific free license, assume it is under copyright. See Commons:Licensing for an overview. Note that English language Wikipedia can accept a limited amount of copyrighted content within certain restrictions if there is no PD or free licensed alternative image that illustrates the subject; see Wikipedia:Non-free content. Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:13, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Porto Rico" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Porto Rico. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 2#Porto Rico until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Soumya-8974 (he) ^talk _contribs ^subpages 06:05, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day![edit]

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:46, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Society Recordings for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Society Recordings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Society Recordings until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Clarityfiend (talk) 06:47, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 22[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 7th Ward of New Orleans, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages John Scott and Joe Jones.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled[edit]

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Thanks so much and happy holidays![edit]

Everything is Going to be Alright, Martin Creed, 2015.

Thank you for all your edits and contributions, and ESPECIALLY for your patience with hearing about and finally helping to solve somebody's odd slow-trolling of Judy Garland. I wish you a happy holiday, you deserve it! HouseOfChange (talk) 20:11, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merchandise giveaway nomination[edit]

A token of thanks

Hi Infrogmation! I've nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk ~~~~~

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How we will see unregistered users[edit]

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

New administrator activity requirement[edit]

The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.

Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:

Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period

Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.

22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Twentieth anniversary on Wikipedia!![edit]

Invitation to join the Twenty Year Society[edit]

Dear Infrogmation/Archive June 2019 - 2022,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Twenty Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for twenty years or more.

Best regards, Chris Troutman (talk) 18:29, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Basilica of St. Stephen[edit]

Per your suggestion, I have created an article on the Basilica of St. Stephen (New Orleans). Please have a look. Your ideas and suggestions are always welcome and helpful. Nolabob (talk) 12:37, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please vote in the 2022 Wikimedia Foundation Inc. Board of Trustees election[edit]

Hello hello. I hope this message finds you well.

The Wikimedia Foundation Inc. Board of Trustees election ends soon, please vote. At least one of the candidates is worthy of support. --MZMcBride (talk) 14:38, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Indians" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Indians and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 29#Indians until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Privybst (talk) 11:28, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Footer[edit]

This is an archive of discussion from User talk:Infrogmation

Next older archive: User talk:Infrogmation/Archive 2015-May 2019

Next more recent: None at present