User talk:JJ4sad6

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! NSR 30 June 2005 13:17 (UTC)

Christian Reconstructionism[edit]

I think there is solid material to research the subject. You need to avoid the most hyperbolic claims by critics, and the claims by supporters that paper over some tough questions. There is actually a multi-discipline current in scholarship which has a journal called Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions. The page here on Wiki on Christian Reconstructionism is actually quite good, and has some very useful cites (at least it did ten minutes ago). Remember, nothing on Wiki should be used with checking. Also, see my five part series on "The Christian Right, Dominionism, and Theocracy" at http://www.talk2action.org. Hope this helps.--Cberlet 19:53, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Number Crunching[edit]

OK, how about taking the national election data and seeing if there is a way to compare it to demographic data on wealth and race by zip code to see if Black voters who said they were concerned about moral values split based on income levels for the Republicans or Democrats; and if that varied between the two states? John C. Green at the University of Akron is an expert on this type of analysis. Check out some of his journal and popular articles and book chapters. Take a look at this article for related ideas. [1]--Cberlet 23:40, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I read[edit]

Your biography. Have you considered helping out at the mediation cabal? - FrancisTyers · 16:42, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Digital roots of multiples of 11[edit]

Let's choose, say, 44. Times 9 that's 396. 3 + 9 + 6 = 18. Since that's more than one digit, we repeat to get the digital root: 1 + 8 = 9. It works even though 44 is a multiple of 11. PrimeFan 22:35, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Palfrey[edit]

For the record, I do get involved with controversial and contentious articles. I arrogate to myself the belief that I do so in order to keep the subject matter neutral. Naturally, the degree with which I achieve that is quite variable. I loathe to discuss my political leanings as my goal is to keep those at bay but suffice to say I'm not working for the RNC.

I appreciate the level-headedness of your discussions on the talk page. ∴ Therefore | talk 18:52, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]